Table 5

Pros and cons of bibliometric tools

ItemVOSviewerBibliometrix
Software requirementsLinux, Windows or MacOSLinux, Windows or MacOS
Install requirementsDownload the appropriate version for your operating systemRequires installation of R language IDE and then of the Bibliometrix package
Requires programming knowledgeNoYes
Ease of useHighLow
CustomizabilityLowHigh
Import data from (file formats accepted)SCOPUS (CSV), Clarivate Analytics Web of Science (Plaintext or tab-delimited), PubMed/Medline (MEDLINE) and Dimensions (CSV)SCOPUS (BibTeX or CSV), Clarivate Analytics Web of Science (Plaintext, BibTeX or EndNote), PubMed/Medline (MEDLINE), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Plaintext) and RISmed (RIS)
Load multiple filesYesYes
Data analysis from multiple sourcesNoYes
API supportMicrosoft Academic, Crossref, Europe PMC, Semantic Scholar, the Open Citations Corpus (OCC), OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI), and WikidataDimensions, NCBI PubMed and Scopus
Exports spreadsheetsYesNo
Dictionary creation (thesaurus)YesNo
Exclusive analysis that only one of the tools deliversTemporal evolution of authors and institutionsImpact indexes (H-index, G-index, M-index)
Totalization of authors, sources, base document
Flexibility and responsiveness to the useHighLow

Source(s): Adopted from Arruda et al. (2022) 

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options