Table 5 Test results of optimized...

Table 5

Test results of optimized texture sample and nontexture sample

Group name	Width (W)/µm	Depth (D)/µm	Spacing (S)/µm	Average friction coefficient μ	Average wear mark width W_m/µm
Nontexture	0	0	0	0.15	2,286
Optimal texture	69	24	1,162	0.13	1,734
Optimal prediction	69	24	1,162	0.13	1,541

Group name	Width (W)/µm	Depth (D)/µm	Spacing (S)/µm	Average friction coefficient μ	Average wear mark width W_m/µm
Nontexture	0	0	0	0.15	2,286
Optimal texture	69	24	1,162	0.13	1,734
Optimal prediction	69	24	1,162	0.13	1,541

Source: Authors’ own creation

Sharing Unavailable