Table 2. Subsample analyses Demographic... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2.

Subsample analyses

Demographic characteristics	CEO pay knowledge	Worker pay knowledge	CEO pay concern before information	CEO pay concern after information
Employment status
0 = not employed (n = 54), 1 = employed (n = 173)	1.70 vs 1.84	2.26 vs 2.38	2.07 vs 2.10	2.28 vs 2.25
Gender
0 = male (n = 111), 1 = female (n = 124)	2.10 vs 1.61***	2.48 vs 2.31	1.93 vs 2.35*	2.05 vs 2.55**
Race
0 = not White (n = 44), 1 = White (n = 194)	1.59 vs 1.90	2.18 vs 2.42	2.14 vs 2.14	2.19 vs 2.33
Marital status
0 = single (n = 95), 1 = partnered (n = 124)	1.60 vs 1.96*	2.20 vs 2.47*	2.06 vs 2.13	2.27 vs 2.28
Need to work
0 = no need (n = 65), 1 = need (n = 172)	1.68 vs 1.91	2.17 vs 2.47*	1.89 vs 2.24	2.08 vs 2.39
Investment experience
0 = no (n = 86), 1 = yes (n = 151)	1.47 vs 2.07***	2.30 vs 2.44	2.49 vs 1.95**	2.60 vs 2.13**
Self or family CEO or business owner
0 = no (n = 61), 1 = yes (n = 30)	2.36 vs 2.60	3.00 vs 3.20	2.89 vs 2.67	2.97 vs 2.57

Demographic characteristics	CEO pay knowledge	Worker pay knowledge	CEO pay concern before information	CEO pay concern after information
Employment status
0 = not employed (n = 54), 1 = employed (n = 173)	1.70 vs 1.84	2.26 vs 2.38	2.07 vs 2.10	2.28 vs 2.25
Gender
0 = male (n = 111), 1 = female (n = 124)	2.10 vs 1.61***	2.48 vs 2.31	1.93 vs 2.35*	2.05 vs 2.55**
Race
0 = not White (n = 44), 1 = White (n = 194)	1.59 vs 1.90	2.18 vs 2.42	2.14 vs 2.14	2.19 vs 2.33
Marital status
0 = single (n = 95), 1 = partnered (n = 124)	1.60 vs 1.96*	2.20 vs 2.47*	2.06 vs 2.13	2.27 vs 2.28
Need to work
0 = no need (n = 65), 1 = need (n = 172)	1.68 vs 1.91	2.17 vs 2.47*	1.89 vs 2.24	2.08 vs 2.39
Investment experience
0 = no (n = 86), 1 = yes (n = 151)	1.47 vs 2.07***	2.30 vs 2.44	2.49 vs 1.95**	2.60 vs 2.13**
Self or family CEO or business owner
0 = no (n = 61), 1 = yes (n = 30)	2.36 vs 2.60	3.00 vs 3.20	2.89 vs 2.67	2.97 vs 2.57

Notes:

*p < 0.05;

**p < 0.01; and

***p < 0.001

Sources: Table by authors; Steele & Holtzen