Thematic analysis of the qualitative data from human expert feedback on the responses
| Theme | Positive feedback | Negative feedback |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensiveness | R5 (V6): Risks identified from a variety of perspectives and broken down into different areas. All also identified a number of measures. At this level and with this information, a comprehensive assessment has been made | R1 (V4): The answers and analysis of risks are very limited and leave most of the potential risk factors unmentioned/unanalyzed |
| R7 (V13): Respondent lists the three most significant risks. I agree with these. These have not been analyzed in detail in this section, but on the other hand respondent 13 has already opened up these issues in Section 2. For example 10 sentences per risk | R13 (V15): Key issues identified, but a limited response | |
| R17 (V1): The user is well highlighted, with small things (such as information, e.g. weekly newsletters) the project can be streamlined considerably. An angry user can put the whole project in crisis. Realities taken into account, updates to plans will always come. In scheduling, consideration of the collection of planning baseline data and changes is essential | R19 (V1): Identifies the features of the project but not the risks associated with that feature | |
| R1 (AI): Responses are comprehensive and take into account the majority of critical risks and their management in the type of site presented | R7 (AI): A broad sample of risks is a good thing in itself. Some of the risks were quite generic, it seems that a generic list of project risks was used | |
| R3 (AI): The answer is comprehensive and I think quite good | R19 (AI): Responses at a general level. No specific characteristics of the project are identified. Comprehensive list otherwise | |
| R5 (AI): Risks are identified from a variety of perspectives and broken down into different areas. All also identified a number of measures. At this level and with this information, a comprehensive assessment has been made | R19 (AI): Lack of identification of risks | |
| R7 (AI): The main risks are well-listed and analyzed. Clearly the best answer to point 3 | R19 (AI): Did not open up the risks of the project | |
| R13 (AI): The response lists a wide range of risk types and risks | ||
| R17 (AI): Risks considered comprehensively from different perspectives, but at a general level | ||
| Specificity and practicality | R7 (V13): A broad sample of risks and well-opened them. Clearly the risks have been thought through specifically for this project. Clearly the best risk coverage of the responses presented | R3 (V1): In addition, neighbors, site organization and safety should be taken into account when working in a densely populated area in Töölö |
| R8 (V11): Relevant risks identified, analyses in previous section but could be more comprehensive | R6 (V14): Answer confusingly in other paragraphs | |
| R8 (V11): This was a very explicit assessment of site-specific risks based on baseline data | R7 (V4): I would have liked to have seen a more detailed analysis of the risks, now I am left with general remarks | |
| R7 (AI): Very well opened up to more specific measures per risk. Clearly the best answer to point 4 | R13 (V8): The response was limited and project specificity was not taken into account | |
| R9 (AI): In response, risk identification and analysis is broad but sufficiently focused on the project. The answers to question 2 are a bit more circular than those from V13, hence the lower score. Overall, the best answer, where the analysis is of high quality and clarifies the risks identified, followed by management measures that provide good steps based on the analysis | R14 (V1): The sentences are not complete, and for the most part leave it unclear how the potential risks presented will affect the achievement of the project's objectives | |
| R13 (AI): Critical risks are well selected and the main points are disclosed | R3 (AI): A few points that are left floating in the air without concrete action, e.g. “Use a procurement strategy that ensures competitive prices and quality materials” | |
| R17 (AI): Risks considered comprehensively from different perspectives, but at a general level (perhaps more specificity on some points?) The answers to questions 2 and 3 are general, but very concrete suggestions are given in answer 4 | R8 (AI): Site specificity had been taken into account, but for the most part this was a fairly general list of risks that apply to any project | |
| R10 (AI): Clearly knows a lot about risk management, but the concrete measures risk getting lost in the mass of text/prioritization falls by the wayside | ||
| Feasibility of implementation | R17 (V8): Concise answer, not much to evaluate. Occupational safety risks good points! Essential points mentioned, such as output data risks | R3 (V10): The answer is a bit off track. There is no mention in the brief of any zoning change or of the building being protected |
| R19 (V1): Solution-oriented and project-specific | R8 (V13): A rather superficial answer | |
| R7 (AI): Very well opened up to more specific measures per risk | R3 (AI): There are certain points in the response which are extremely difficult to implement in practice | |
| R9 (AI): Overall, the best answer, where the analysis is of high quality and clarifies the risks identified, followed by management measures that provide good steps based on the analysis | R6 (AI): I would have liked to have seen some mention of proper resourcing of the site and possible double-shift working to manage the schedule risk | |
| R13 (AI): The issues are presented well and clearly. The process for dealing with surprising isolated anomalies and incidents is not specified, but at a higher level the answers are good | R11 (AI): Respondent is not in a position to lead these projects | |
| R19 (AI): A good attempt to prevent the risks identified. Partly describing the basic tasks, could describe the specificities of the project and the deviating measures | R15 (AI): The timetable given is so tight that it cannot be flexible – focus on advance planning and preparation | |
| Abundance of information | R10 (V7): This is probably my favorite when you keep the answers suitably short (although not as comprehensive as respondent 17 [AI]) | R7 (V4): In the big picture, significant risks identified, but remained at a rather general level. I would have liked to see a broader list of risks and a slightly more defined set of risks |
| R10 (V14): It must be a genuine doer since he doesn't talk nonsense and the answers show the background of the construction | R19 (V9): Disruption management well identified, safety at work not. Aiming to do the job well is not a measure of risk management | |
| R15 (V16): Right things | R10 (AI): Clearly knows a lot about risk management, but the concrete measures risk getting lost in the mass of text/prioritization falls by the wayside | |
| R8 (AI): Essential risks identified from a long list and concisely but well analyzed | R15 (AI): I would have emphasized the specificities of renovation in terms of schedule and user cooperation, which also have an impact on the schedule, rather than quality risks | |
| R9 (AI): Overall, the best answer, where the analysis is of high quality and clarifies the risks identified, followed by management measures that provide good steps based on the analysis | ||
| R14 (AI): The respondent has identified in detail and in a comprehensive manner the potential challenges related to the project |
| Theme | Positive feedback | Negative feedback |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensiveness | R5 (V6): Risks identified from a variety of perspectives and broken down into different areas. All also identified a number of measures. At this level and with this information, a comprehensive assessment has been made | R1 (V4): The answers and analysis of risks are very limited and leave most of the potential risk factors unmentioned/unanalyzed |
| R7 (V13): Respondent lists the three most significant risks. I agree with these. These have not been analyzed in detail in this section, but on the other hand respondent 13 has already opened up these issues in | R13 (V15): Key issues identified, but a limited response | |
| R17 (V1): The user is well highlighted, with small things (such as information, e.g. weekly newsletters) the project can be streamlined considerably. An angry user can put the whole project in crisis. Realities taken into account, updates to plans will always come. In scheduling, consideration of the collection of planning baseline data and changes is essential | R19 (V1): Identifies the features of the project but not the risks associated with that feature | |
| R1 (AI): Responses are comprehensive and take into account the majority of critical risks and their management in the type of site presented | R7 (AI): A broad sample of risks is a good thing in itself. Some of the risks were quite generic, it seems that a generic list of project risks was used | |
| R3 (AI): The answer is comprehensive and I think quite good | R19 (AI): Responses at a general level. No specific characteristics of the project are identified. Comprehensive list otherwise | |
| R5 (AI): Risks are identified from a variety of perspectives and broken down into different areas. All also identified a number of measures. At this level and with this information, a comprehensive assessment has been made | R19 (AI): Lack of identification of risks | |
| R7 (AI): The main risks are well-listed and analyzed. Clearly the best answer to point 3 | R19 (AI): Did not open up the risks of the project | |
| R13 (AI): The response lists a wide range of risk types and risks | ||
| R17 (AI): Risks considered comprehensively from different perspectives, but at a general level | ||
| Specificity and practicality | R7 (V13): A broad sample of risks and well-opened them. Clearly the risks have been thought through specifically for this project. Clearly the best risk coverage of the responses presented | R3 (V1): In addition, neighbors, site organization and safety should be taken into account when working in a densely populated area in Töölö |
| R8 (V11): Relevant risks identified, analyses in previous section but could be more comprehensive | R6 (V14): Answer confusingly in other paragraphs | |
| R8 (V11): This was a very explicit assessment of site-specific risks based on baseline data | R7 (V4): I would have liked to have seen a more detailed analysis of the risks, now I am left with general remarks | |
| R7 (AI): Very well opened up to more specific measures per risk. Clearly the best answer to point 4 | R13 (V8): The response was limited and project specificity was not taken into account | |
| R9 (AI): In response, risk identification and analysis is broad but sufficiently focused on the project. The answers to question 2 are a bit more circular than those from V13, hence the lower score. Overall, the best answer, where the analysis is of high quality and clarifies the risks identified, followed by management measures that provide good steps based on the analysis | R14 (V1): The sentences are not complete, and for the most part leave it unclear how the potential risks presented will affect the achievement of the project's objectives | |
| R13 (AI): Critical risks are well selected and the main points are disclosed | R3 (AI): A few points that are left floating in the air without concrete action, e.g. “Use a procurement strategy that ensures competitive prices and quality materials” | |
| R17 (AI): Risks considered comprehensively from different perspectives, but at a general level (perhaps more specificity on some points?) The answers to questions 2 and 3 are general, but very concrete suggestions are given in answer 4 | R8 (AI): Site specificity had been taken into account, but for the most part this was a fairly general list of risks that apply to any project | |
| R10 (AI): Clearly knows a lot about risk management, but the concrete measures risk getting lost in the mass of text/prioritization falls by the wayside | ||
| Feasibility of implementation | R17 (V8): Concise answer, not much to evaluate. Occupational safety risks good points! Essential points mentioned, such as output data risks | R3 (V10): The answer is a bit off track. There is no mention in the brief of any zoning change or of the building being protected |
| R19 (V1): Solution-oriented and project-specific | R8 (V13): A rather superficial answer | |
| R7 (AI): Very well opened up to more specific measures per risk | R3 (AI): There are certain points in the response which are extremely difficult to implement in practice | |
| R9 (AI): Overall, the best answer, where the analysis is of high quality and clarifies the risks identified, followed by management measures that provide good steps based on the analysis | R6 (AI): I would have liked to have seen some mention of proper resourcing of the site and possible double-shift working to manage the schedule risk | |
| R13 (AI): The issues are presented well and clearly. The process for dealing with surprising isolated anomalies and incidents is not specified, but at a higher level the answers are good | R11 (AI): Respondent is not in a position to lead these projects | |
| R19 (AI): A good attempt to prevent the risks identified. Partly describing the basic tasks, could describe the specificities of the project and the deviating measures | R15 (AI): The timetable given is so tight that it cannot be flexible – focus on advance planning and preparation | |
| Abundance of information | R10 (V7): This is probably my favorite when you keep the answers suitably short (although not as comprehensive as respondent 17 [AI]) | R7 (V4): In the big picture, significant risks identified, but remained at a rather general level. I would have liked to see a broader list of risks and a slightly more defined set of risks |
| R10 (V14): It must be a genuine doer since he doesn't talk nonsense and the answers show the background of the construction | R19 (V9): Disruption management well identified, safety at work not. Aiming to do the job well is not a measure of risk management | |
| R15 (V16): Right things | R10 (AI): Clearly knows a lot about risk management, but the concrete measures risk getting lost in the mass of text/prioritization falls by the wayside | |
| R8 (AI): Essential risks identified from a long list and concisely but well analyzed | R15 (AI): I would have emphasized the specificities of renovation in terms of schedule and user cooperation, which also have an impact on the schedule, rather than quality risks | |
| R9 (AI): Overall, the best answer, where the analysis is of high quality and clarifies the risks identified, followed by management measures that provide good steps based on the analysis | ||
| R14 (AI): The respondent has identified in detail and in a comprehensive manner the potential challenges related to the project |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.