Table 7 Logistic regressions predicting...

Table 7

Logistic regressions predicting factors affecting the likelihood of respondents reporting a higher distance between formal ethics and ethics in use for scenario 7 (the middleman real estate agent is recommending a specific property inspector to a client)

	B	S.E.	Sig.	Odds ratio	95% C.I. for odds ratio
	B	S.E.	Sig.	Odds ratio	Lower	Upper
Gender	0.117	0.117	0.315	1.125	0.894	1.414
Age	−0.030	0.007	<0.001***	0.971	0.958	0.984
Year in profession	−0.026	0.009	0.005	0.974	0.957	0.992
Local market	0.563	0.126	<0.001***	1.756	1.372	2.248
Number of yearly transactions	−0.001	0.002	0.563	0.999	0.995	1.003
Receiving penalty	0.137	0.192	0.476	1.147	0.787	1.672
Constant	1.493	0.279	<0.001***	4.450

	B	S.E.	Sig.	Oddsratio	95% C.I. for odds ratio
	B	S.E.	Sig.	Oddsratio	Lower	Upper
Gender	0.117	0.117	0.315	1.125	0.894	1.414
Age	−0.030	0.007	<0.001***	0.971	0.958	0.984
Year in profession	−0.026	0.009	0.005	0.974	0.957	0.992
Local market	0.563	0.126	<0.001***	1.756	1.372	2.248
Number of yearly transactions	−0.001	0.002	0.563	0.999	0.995	1.003
Receiving penalty	0.137	0.192	0.476	1.147	0.787	1.672
Constant	1.493	0.279	<0.001***	4.450

Note(s): The dependent variable is SCEN7bin. The number of observations is 1,391. The Cox and Snell R² is 0.094; the Nagelkerke R² is 0.126. *** = Statistically significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

Source(s): Authors' own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable