SME Feedback for proposed framework
| Subject matter expert | Experience | Approve/Comments | Feedback for each gate/Success factor | General comments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gate 0 | Gate 1 | Gate 2 | Gate 3 | Gate 4 | ||||
| SME 1 | Senior leader in digital manufacturing Engineering and Digital implementation specialist | Approve | As below, sustainability piece would be a good addition | Maybe a review to understand previous projects similar and reviewing lessons learnt | Revisit the business case and confirmation with key stakeholders within the business and finance manager | Revisit business case | How do we capture and make lessons learnt available globally and across functions? | |
| SME 2 | Senior Leader in Industrialization Manufacturing Engineering and Product Introduction Specialist | Approve | Training plans should be included here, or at least discussed and built into investment | Change to training booked? | Consider moving training to earlier in the framework strategy? Or a single theme from Gate 0 to 4? | Minimum standard review and update would complement this gate | Titles for gates misleading, Leadership and Training don't portray Deployment and Go-Live well enough. What does good look like? Does this need a supporting minimum standard? | |
| SME 3 | Manufacturing Engineering Specialist | Approve | Could benefit from risk register and reviewing previous lessons learned at this early stage | A well-constructed framework that should help Manufacturing Engineering robustly deploy I4.0 initiatives | ||||
| SME 4 | Manufacturing Engineering Specialist | Approve | Include Sustainability element | Include re-evaluation of business case | Inclusion of obsolescence Strategy? Maybe Gate 1 as part of infrastructure requirements? Is “Hardware and Software deployed” the deployment plans or successful gate 2 would be completion of deployment? Include re-evaluation of business case | Maybe pull continuity plans forward to gate 2? Include re-evaluation of business case | Include key practitioners/key end users in gate panel | |
| Subject matter expert | Experience | Approve/Comments | Feedback for each gate/Success factor | General comments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gate 0 | Gate 1 | Gate 2 | Gate 3 | Gate 4 | ||||
| SME 1 | Senior leader in digital manufacturing Engineering and Digital implementation specialist | Approve | As below, sustainability piece would be a good addition | Maybe a review to understand previous projects similar and reviewing lessons learnt | Revisit the business case and confirmation with key stakeholders within the business and finance manager | Revisit business case | How do we capture and make lessons learnt available globally and across functions? | |
| SME 2 | Senior Leader in Industrialization Manufacturing Engineering and Product Introduction Specialist | Approve | Training plans should be included here, or at least discussed and built into investment | Change to training booked? | Consider moving training to earlier in the framework strategy? Or a single theme from Gate 0 to 4? | Minimum standard review and update would complement this gate | Titles for gates misleading, Leadership and Training don't portray Deployment and Go-Live well enough. What does good look like? Does this need a supporting minimum standard? | |
| SME 3 | Manufacturing Engineering Specialist | Approve | Could benefit from risk register and reviewing previous lessons learned at this early stage | A well-constructed framework that should help Manufacturing Engineering robustly deploy I4.0 initiatives | ||||
| SME 4 | Manufacturing Engineering Specialist | Approve | Include Sustainability element | Include re-evaluation of business case | Inclusion of obsolescence Strategy? Maybe Gate 1 as part of infrastructure requirements? Is “Hardware and Software deployed” the deployment plans or successful gate 2 would be completion of deployment? Include re-evaluation of business case | Maybe pull continuity plans forward to gate 2? Include re-evaluation of business case | Include key practitioners/key end users in gate panel | |
Source(s): Authors' own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.