Table V.

Hypotheses testing

Parameter estimates (standardized values)SEt-test
Direct relationship   
H1: Omnichannel consumer journey design → Online consumer experience0.385*0.0943.87
H2: Omnichannel Consumer Journey Design → e-Satisfaction0.215*0.0683.87
H3: Online consumer experience → e-Satisfaction0.657*0.0899.60
Indirect relationship
H4: Omnichannel consumer journey design → e-Satisfaction0.253*0.0913.40
Relationship between control variables and e-Satisfaction:
Customer's age → e-Satisfaction−0.172*0.004−2.90
Customer's gender → e-Satisfaction0.179*0.1063.41
Customer's level of education → e-Satisfaction−0.003a0.049−0.052
Measurement model
Omnichannel consumer journey design → Thematic cohesion1Fixed
Omnichannel consumer journey design → Consistency0.954*0.08712.55
Omnichannel consumer journey design → Context sensitivity0.826*0.09511.07
Online consumer experience → Informativeness0.823Fixed
Online consumer experience → Social presence0.874*0.13810.62
Online consumer experience → Sensory appeal0.935*0.10212.85
Online consumer experience → Entertainment0.746*0.1458.84
Dependent factorR2
Online consumer experience0.148
e-Satisfaction0.651
Goodness-of-fit indices for the structural modelSatorra–Bentler chi-squared = 580.915; df = 388;
p-value = 0.000; Satorra–Bentler χ2/df = 1.49;
CFI = 0.95; BBNFI = 0.86; BBNNFI = 0.94;
IFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.05

Notes: *Significant at p ≤ 0.05; a Non-significant

Source: Authors' own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal