Table 2

Results of hierarchical regression analysis

VariablesHarmonious work passionTurnover intention
Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5
Control variables
Protégé gender−0.252(0.131)−0.273*(0.127)−0.124(0.104)−0.057(0.240)0.023(0.203)
Protégé age0.002(0.019)−0.012(0.018)−0.023(0.015)−0.056(0.034)−0.002(0.029)
Protégé education0.020(0.064)0.044(0.062)0.018(0.051)−0.057(0.117)−0.145(0.099)
Protégé job tenure0.000(0.002)0.001(0.002)0.001(0.001)0.003(0.003)−0.002(0.003)
Protégé position0.225(0.137)0.242(0.133)0.051(0.111)0.023(0.251)−0.041(0.213)
Firm1−0.290*(0.116)−0.235*(0.113)−0.202*(0.093)0.683**(0.212)0.476**(0.181)
Firm2−0.303*(0.139)−0.228(0.136)−0.080(0.112)0.971***(0.256)0.688**(0.218)
Mentor–protégé gender difference0.201(0.114)0.197(0.111)0.074(0.091)−0.232(0.210)−0.218(0.177)
Mentor–protégé age difference−0.010(0.007)−0.013(0.007)−0.009(0.005)0.014(0.013)0.024*(0.011)
Independent variable
Protégé negative mentoring experiences −0.180***(0.041)−0.062(0.036) 0.683***(0.066)
Moderator
Moqi with mentor  0.625***(0.055)  
Interaction
Protégé negative mentoring experiences × Moqi with the mentor  −0.125**(0.039)  
Mediator
Harmonious work passion
R20.0740.1360.4300.1120.366
ΔR2 0.061***0.294*** 0.253***
F2.415*4.239***16.826***3.805***15.566***

Note(s):N = 281. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Two-tailed tests

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal