Table 5 Comparison of self-directed... | Emerald Publishing

Table 5

Comparison of self-directed learning constructs between mentored and non-mentored individuals

	Mean	Std Dev	t-value	p-value	Cohen’s D Effect size
Self-directed learning
Mentor	4.189	0.769	7.802	0.000**	1.013
No mentor	3.506	0.682	7.802	0.000**	1.013
Self-Management
Mentor	4.013	0.633	6.437	0.000**	0.923
No mentor	3.380	0.709	6.437	0.000**	0.923
Desire for Learning
Mentor	4.275	0.588	7.218	0.000**	0.934
No mentor	3.592	0.791	7.218	0.000**	0.934
Self-Control
Mentor	4.266	0.5513	8.105	0.000**	1.044
No mentor	3.542	0.7538	8.105	0.000**	1.044

	Mean	Std Dev	t-value	p-value	Cohen’s DEffect size
Self-directed learning
Mentor	4.189	0.769	7.802	0.000**	1.013
No mentor	3.506	0.682	7.802	0.000**	1.013
Self-Management
Mentor	4.013	0.633	6.437	0.000**	0.923
No mentor	3.380	0.709	6.437	0.000**	0.923
Desire for Learning
Mentor	4.275	0.588	7.218	0.000**	0.934
No mentor	3.592	0.791	7.218	0.000**	0.934
Self-Control
Mentor	4.266	0.5513	8.105	0.000**	1.044
No mentor	3.542	0.7538	8.105	0.000**	1.044

Note(s): Had mentor: N = 72; Did not have mentor: N = 150

Source(s): Author’s own work