Table 3 Structural model results Model I... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Structural model results

Model I	Model II
R²_CR = 0.630 R²_PR = 0.617	R²_CR = 0.675 R²_PR = 0.677 R²_KMP = 0.654

				Percentile		Bias corrected
Relationships	Path coefficient	Support	Path coefficient	Bootstrap lower	95% CI upper	Lower bias corrected	Upper bias corrected	Support
H1: DC→CR	0.794^*** (17.607)	Yes	0.478^*** (6.525)	0.36	0.599	0.36	0.599	Yes
H1II: DC→ PR	0.786^*** (19.154)	Yes	0.439^*** (5.195)	0.301	0.579	0.3	0.577	Yes
H2: KMP→ CR			0.385*** (5.116)	0.264	0.509	0.261	0.506	Yes
H2II: KMP→ PR			0.426^*** (5.300)	0.292	0.555	0.292	0.555	Yes
H3: DC→ KMP			0.809^*** (18.621)	0.73^***	0.871	0.732^***	0.873	Yes

				Percentile		Bias corrected
Relationships	Path coefficient	Support	Path coefficient	Bootstrap lower	95% CI upper	Lower bias corrected	Upper bias corrected	Support
H1: DC→CR	0.794^*** (17.607)	Yes	0.478^*** (6.525)	0.36	0.599	0.36	0.599	Yes
H1II: DC→ PR	0.786^*** (19.154)	Yes	0.439^*** (5.195)	0.301	0.579	0.3	0.577	Yes
H2: KMP→ CR			0.385*** (5.116)	0.264	0.509	0.261	0.506	Yes
H2II: KMP→ PR			0.426^*** (5.300)	0.292	0.555	0.292	0.555	Yes
H3: DC→ KMP			0.809^*** (18.621)	0.73^***	0.871	0.732^***	0.873	Yes

Note(s): DC: dynamic capabilities; CR: customer results; PR: people results; KMP: knowledge management process

t Values in parentheses: t (0.05, 4999) = 1.645; t(0.01, 4999) = 2.327; t(0.001, 4999) = 3.092

⁎p < 0.05; ⁎⁎ p < 0.01; ⁎⁎⁎ p < 0.001

Source(s): Authors' own creation