Table 2.

A summary of the type of performances and outcomes of the studies in the review

AuthorType of performancesOutcome of medical leadership
Amanda H. Goodall (Goodall, 2011)Hospital quality ranking:
i. Patient care
ii. Delivery of care
iii. Mortality rates
Higher performance
Gianluca Veronesi et al. (Veronesi et al., 2013)Hospital quality ranking:
i. Health and well-being
ii. Clinical effectiveness
iii. Safety and patient focus
iv. Ease and equity of access
Higher performance
Ge Bai and Ranjani Krishnan (Bai and Krishnan, 2015)Quality of careHigher performance
Gianluca Veronesi et al. (Veronesi et al., 2015)Patient experienceHigher performance
Michael C. Tasi et al (Tasi et al., 2017)Hospital quality ranking:
i. Patient care
ii. Delivery of care
iii. Mortality rates
Higher performance
Hospital volumeNo difference
Financial performanceNo difference
Collins Yazenga and Mkandawire (Mkandawire, 2017)Hospital net income
Patient experience ratings
Mortality rates
No difference
Florian Kaiser et. al. (Kaiser et al., 2020)Mortality rates
Patient satisfaction
Higher performance
Financial performanceLower performance
Youssef fares et. al. (Fares et al., 2018)Hospital ranking – Web indicator based on visibility, size, rich files and scholarLower performance

Notes:

HI = health-care institution; NHS = National Health Service; MOH = Ministry of Health; UK = United Kingdom; US = United States; TEL = theory of expert leadership; EL = expert leadership; IK = inherent knowledge; IE = industry experience; LC = leadership capabilities; PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; MREC = Medical Research and Ethics Committee; MD = medicine; CEO = chief executive officer; HQA = Hospital Quality Alliance; NHS = National Health Service; LMIC = low- and middle-income countries

Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal