Hierarchical regression result of process models
| Model 1 (moderation) | Model 4 (mediation) | Model 14 (moderation) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | RRLSPC | RRLSPC | RBI | RRLSPC | RBI |
| Control variable | |||||
| Gender | 0.2177* [−0.0198, 0.4553] | 0.2163* [−0.0301, 0.4626] | −0.0465 [−0.2478, 0.1547] | 0.2163* [−0.0301, 0.4626] | −0.0346 [−0.2331, 0.1638] |
| Income | −0.0047 [−0.0437, 0.0343] | −0.0006 [−0.0411, 0.0398] | 0.0289* [−0.004, 0.0619] | −0.0006 [−0.0411,0.0398] | 0.0255 [−0.0071, 0.0582] |
| Shop Frequency | 0.0913 [−0.0680, 0.2507] | 0.0617 [−0.1026, 0.02261] | 0.0604 [−0.0736, 0.1943] | 0.0617 [−0.1026,0.2261] | 0.0571 [−0.0753, 0.1895] |
| Age | 0.0068 [−0.0031, 0.0169] | 0.0064 [−0.0041, 0.0168] | 0.0036 [−0.0049,0.0121] | 0.0064 [−0.004,0.0168] | 0.0032 [−0.0052, 0.0115] |
| Social desirability | 0.1283** [0.0002, 0.2564] | 0.1662** [0.0341, 0.2984] | 0.0243 [−0.084, 0.1326] | 0.1662** [0.0341, 0.2984] | 0.0335 [−0.0734,0.1403] |
| Education | 0.0631 [−0.0281, 0.1542] | 0.0761 [−0.0182, 0.1705] | −0.0289 [−0.1059, 0.0481] | 0.0761 [−0.0182, 0.1705] | −0.0317 [−0.108,0.0446] |
| Main effects | |||||
| TRPC | 0.2746*** [0.1418, 0.4074] | 0.4649*** [0.4099, 0.52] | 0.1665*** [0.111, 0.2223] | 0.4649*** [0.4099,0.52] | 0.1647*** [0.1089,0.2204] |
| TLPC | 0.1053 [−0.0251, 0.2356] | ||||
| RIC | N/A | 0.1658** [0.0004, 0.3312] | |||
| RRLSPC | N/A | 0.6226*** [0.5513, 0.6939] | 0.5556*** [0.4177,0.6936] | ||
| Interaction effects | |||||
| TRPC × TLPC | 0.0302** [0.0005, 0.0599] | ||||
| RIC × RRLSPC | −0.0069 [−0.0396, 0.0258] | ||||
| Constant | 0.7452 | 0.8176 | 0.4699 | 0.8176 | 0.2513 |
| F-value (df) | 40.1654 (9, 502) | 42.5274 (7, 504) | 90.2727 (8, 503) | 42.5275 (7, 504) | 75.9655 (10, 501) |
| 0.4186 | 0.3713 | 0.5894 | 0.3713 | 0.6026 | |
| Indirect effect | 0.2895 [0.2366, 0.3455] | ||||
| Index of moderated mediation | −0.0032 (0.0094) CI [−0.0215, 0.0151] | ||||
| N | 512 | 512 | 512 | 512 | 512 |
| Model 1 (moderation) | Model 4 (mediation) | Model 14 (moderation) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | RRLSPC | RRLSPC | RBI | RRLSPC | RBI |
| Gender | 0.2177* [−0.0198, 0.4553] | 0.2163* [−0.0301, 0.4626] | −0.0465 [−0.2478, 0.1547] | 0.2163* [−0.0301, 0.4626] | −0.0346 [−0.2331, 0.1638] |
| Income | −0.0047 [−0.0437, 0.0343] | −0.0006 [−0.0411, 0.0398] | 0.0289* [−0.004, 0.0619] | −0.0006 [−0.0411,0.0398] | 0.0255 [−0.0071, 0.0582] |
| Shop Frequency | 0.0913 [−0.0680, 0.2507] | 0.0617 [−0.1026, 0.02261] | 0.0604 [−0.0736, 0.1943] | 0.0617 [−0.1026,0.2261] | 0.0571 [−0.0753, 0.1895] |
| Age | 0.0068 [−0.0031, 0.0169] | 0.0064 [−0.0041, 0.0168] | 0.0036 [−0.0049,0.0121] | 0.0064 [−0.004,0.0168] | 0.0032 [−0.0052, 0.0115] |
| Social desirability | 0.1283** [0.0002, 0.2564] | 0.1662** [0.0341, 0.2984] | 0.0243 [−0.084, 0.1326] | 0.1662** [0.0341, 0.2984] | 0.0335 [−0.0734,0.1403] |
| Education | 0.0631 [−0.0281, 0.1542] | 0.0761 [−0.0182, 0.1705] | −0.0289 [−0.1059, 0.0481] | 0.0761 [−0.0182, 0.1705] | −0.0317 [−0.108,0.0446] |
| TRPC | 0.2746*** [0.1418, 0.4074] | 0.4649*** [0.4099, 0.52] | 0.1665*** [0.111, 0.2223] | 0.4649*** [0.4099,0.52] | 0.1647*** [0.1089,0.2204] |
| TLPC | 0.1053 [−0.0251, 0.2356] | ||||
| RIC | N/A | 0.1658** [0.0004, 0.3312] | |||
| RRLSPC | N/A | 0.6226*** [0.5513, 0.6939] | 0.5556*** [0.4177,0.6936] | ||
| TRPC × TLPC | 0.0302** [0.0005, 0.0599] | ||||
| RIC × RRLSPC | −0.0069 [−0.0396, 0.0258] | ||||
| Constant | 0.7452 | 0.8176 | 0.4699 | 0.8176 | 0.2513 |
| F-value (df) | 40.1654 (9, 502) | 42.5274 (7, 504) | 90.2727 (8, 503) | 42.5275 (7, 504) | 75.9655 (10, 501) |
| 0.4186 | 0.3713 | 0.5894 | 0.3713 | 0.6026 | |
| Indirect effect | 0.2895 [0.2366, 0.3455] | ||||
| Index of moderated mediation | −0.0032 (0.0094) CI [−0.0215, 0.0151] | ||||
| 512 | 512 | 512 | 512 | 512 | |
Note(s): Table reports standardized coefficients. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01. Abbreviations: RIC, Retail interactional capability; TLPC, transparent loyalty program capability; TRPC, transparent returns policy capability; RRLSPC, retailer reverse logistics service procedural capability; RBI, repurchase behavioral intention. Hawthorne effect was assessed by collecting data from an out-of-sample population (e.g. Bendoly and Swink, 2007; Ta et al., 2018; Jin et al., 2023; Tokar et al., 2020) and no differences were observed across treatment groups regarding their goals in RB
Source(s): Created by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.