Correlates of sustainable decisions
| Sustainability index | |
|---|---|
| Age | −0.014** |
| (0.007) | |
| Female | 0.136** |
| (0.054) | |
| Trust | 0.025*** |
| (0.009) | |
| Risk | −0.006 |
| (0.012) | |
| Extraversion | −0.020 |
| (0.015) | |
| Agreeableness | −0.014 |
| (0.023) | |
| Conscientiousness | 0.012 |
| (0.022) | |
| Neuroticism | 0.008 |
| (0.019) | |
| Openness to experiences | 0.001 |
| (0.022) | |
| Constant | 0.905*** |
| (0.256) | |
| N | 209 |
| R2 | 0.102 |
| Sustainability index | |
|---|---|
| Age | −0.014** |
| (0.007) | |
| Female | 0.136** |
| (0.054) | |
| Trust | 0.025*** |
| (0.009) | |
| Risk | −0.006 |
| (0.012) | |
| Extraversion | −0.020 |
| (0.015) | |
| Agreeableness | −0.014 |
| (0.023) | |
| Conscientiousness | 0.012 |
| (0.022) | |
| Neuroticism | 0.008 |
| (0.019) | |
| Openness to experiences | 0.001 |
| (0.022) | |
| Constant | 0.905*** |
| (0.256) | |
| 209 | |
| 0.102 |
Note(s): OLS regressions. Dependent variable: = 1 if both choices are sustainable, = 0.5 if one choice is sustainable, 0 otherwise. Standard errors in parenthesis, *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.01
Source(s): Authors’ own work