Analysis of discriminant validity
| Constructs | PU | PP | ICU | Out_Q | PROC_Q |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived usefulness | 0.895 | 0.397 | 0.694 | 0.719 | 0.715 |
| Perceived privacy | 0.396*** | 0.901 | 0.402 | 0.379 | 0.435 |
| Intention to continue use | 0.737*** | 0.433*** | 0.806 | 0.500 | 0.474 |
| Outcome quality | 0.730*** | 0.388*** | 0.546*** | 0.784 | 0.659 |
| Process quality | 0.704*** | 0.401*** | 0.500*** | 0.650*** | 0.838 |
| Constructs | PU | PP | ICU | Out_Q | PROC_Q |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived usefulness | 0.397 | 0.694 | 0.719 | 0.715 | |
| Perceived privacy | 0.396*** | 0.402 | 0.379 | 0.435 | |
| Intention to continue use | 0.737*** | 0.433*** | 0.500 | 0.474 | |
| Outcome quality | 0.730*** | 0.388*** | 0.546*** | 0.659 | |
| Process quality | 0.704*** | 0.401*** | 0.500*** | 0.650*** |
Notes:
The italic values on the diagonal represent the square root of the average variance extracted (AVE) for each construct and the data below the diagonal are the correlations between constructs (Anderson and Gerbing, 1988). ***p < 0.001. The data above the diagonal are the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.