Table 3 Financing the development of... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Financing the development of competencies by an employer vs FoE, Chi-Square test results

	FoE
Competence	B2B	Contract of mandate	χ² (df)	p	Cramer’s V
C1	34 (34%)	12 (12%)	13.66 (1)	<0.001	0.25
C2	21 (21%)	4 (4%)	13.21 (1)	<0.001	0.24
C3	10 (10%)	0 (0%)	10.53 (1)	0.001	0.21
C4	34 (34%)	12 (12%)	13.66 (1)	<0.001	0.25
C5	32 (32%)	13 (13%)	10.35 (1)	0.001	0.22
C6	31 (31%)	7 (7%)	18.71 (1)	<0.001	0.29
C7	12 (12%)	1 (1%)	9.95 (1)	0.002	0.20
C8	2 (2%)	1 (1%)	0.34 (1)	0.561	0.00
C9	14 (14%)	1 (1%)	12.18 (1)	<0.001	0.23
C10	8 (8%)	2 (2%)	3.79 (1)	0.052	0.11
C11	15 (15%)	4 (4%)	7.04 (1)	0.008	0.17
C12	3 (3%)	3 (3%)	0 (1)	1	0.00
C13	6 (6%)	1 (1%)	3.7 (1)	0.054	0.11
C14	15 (15%)	18 (18%)	0.33 (1)	0.568	0.03

	FoE
Competence	B2B	Contract of mandate	χ² (df)	p	Cramer’s V
C1	34 (34%)	12 (12%)	13.66 (1)	<0.001	0.25
C2	21 (21%)	4 (4%)	13.21 (1)	<0.001	0.24
C3	10 (10%)	0 (0%)	10.53 (1)	0.001	0.21
C4	34 (34%)	12 (12%)	13.66 (1)	<0.001	0.25
C5	32 (32%)	13 (13%)	10.35 (1)	0.001	0.22
C6	31 (31%)	7 (7%)	18.71 (1)	<0.001	0.29
C7	12 (12%)	1 (1%)	9.95 (1)	0.002	0.20
C8	2 (2%)	1 (1%)	0.34 (1)	0.561	0.00
C9	14 (14%)	1 (1%)	12.18 (1)	<0.001	0.23
C10	8 (8%)	2 (2%)	3.79 (1)	0.052	0.11
C11	15 (15%)	4 (4%)	7.04 (1)	0.008	0.17
C12	3 (3%)	3 (3%)	0 (1)	1	0.00
C13	6 (6%)	1 (1%)	3.7 (1)	0.054	0.11
C14	15 (15%)	18 (18%)	0.33 (1)	0.568	0.03

Note(s): χ² – Chi-Square test statistics; Cramér’s V – effect size

% refers to the proportion of “yes” answers within a given type of contract

Source(s): Created by authors