Table 1

Analysis of the five classic service-making models

ModelFocusContentEmphasisInnovative aspectContribution to marketing
Shostack’s (1977) molecular modelVisualization of elements of service production in addition to conventional marketing variables and their impact on the customersComparison between the tangible and intangible elements of goods and services as marketing entities; demonstrates that goods and service offerings are mostly intertwinedServices often entwined with their human representatives. In addition, conventional marketing variables and marketing effects created by elements in the production processEmphasis on the need to develop new concepts for marketing to function in service enterprises. The notion that both goods and services offerings consist of tangible and intangible elementsEmphasis on the complexity of the marketed entity. Consideration of marketing as not only comprising conventional variables
Eiglier and Langeard’s (1977) servuction
model
Describes interactions with customers to produce services and service experiencesCustomer contact personnel and physical resources supported by a back-office system, and involved customers interact to shape services. Due to the nature of the interactions, services may be shaped differentlyImportance of service production to customers’ experiences and its role in marketing. The role of customers as participants in the shaping of serviceEmphasis on how production has a marketing-like impact on customers’ experiences and their participation in service production and marketingMarketing not only demand stimulation but comprises marketing-like performances by production processes as well.
Focus on the active role of customers as subjects
Grönroos’s (1978) interactive marketing modelDescribes elements of the service offering and their interactions with customersService contact personnel, accessibility of the service interact with customers to create marketing impact. In addition to a core service, auxiliary services are requiredThe importance to marketing of the embedded communication of the service contact personnel and physical resources and of their accessibility. Customers’ influence on the service. Production resources considered carriers of servicesEmphasis on the importance to marketing of the communication effects of service contact personnel and of how accessible the service is. The notion that customers participate in and influence service productionEmphasis on the importance of service production to marketing. Involvement of accessibility, communication effects and customers’ influence on the service as subjects as well as conventional marketing
Booms and Bitner’s (1982) 
7P model
Extends marketing’s 4P model by adding variables that reflect servicesThree service-grounded elements (people, process, physical elements) are added to marketing’s 4P modelWhat must be included in marketing planning in addition to its conventional content demonstrated by the three added elementsEmphasis on the importance of service processes and service contact personnel as well as the role of physical resources to marketing, in addition to conventional marketingEmphasis on the need for marketing to integrate service-specific elements with conventional variables in marketing planning
Berry’s (1983) relationship marketing modelThe need of service enterprises to take a long-term approach to marketingModel focuses on relationship-making strategies: core service strategy, relationship customization, service augmentation, relationship pricing and internal marketingThe need to think in longer terms in service marketing planning. Alternative means of reinforcing relationship marketingEmphasis on the long-term aspect and the option to choose between focusing on core services or service augmentation. Emphasis on internal marketingEmphasis on a long-term approach, relationship-based pricing and the need for internal marketing
Source: Author’s own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options