Table 9 Comparison of parameter... | Emerald Publishing

Table 9

Comparison of parameter estimates of the structural model

Regression Path	High CT			Low CT			High – Low CT Path differences comparison
Regression Path	Unstandardised Coefficients; β	p	Result	Unstandardised Coefficients; β	p	Result	Differences	Z-score	Result
H8a: PQ → CS	−0.142 (−0.125)	0.299	NS	0.196 (0.188)	0.113	NS	−0.338	1.835	NS
H8b: SQ → CS	0.363 (0.373)	0.000***	Supported	0.001 (0.001)	0.995	NS	0.362	−3.182***	Supported
H8c: PV → CS	0.619 (0.571)	0.000***	Supported	0.299 (0.316)	0.000***	Supported	0.320	−2.161**	Supported
H8d: PQ → BI	0.015 (0.013)	0.901	NS	−0.040 (−0.053)	0.662	NS	0.055	−0.362	NS
H8e: SQ → BI	0.324 (0.316)	0.000***	Supported	0.180 (0.307)	0.003***	Supported	0.144	−1.456	NS
H8f: PV → BI	0.097 (0.085)	0.412	NS	0.078 (0.113)	0.219	NS	0.019	−0.142	NS
H8g: CS → BI	0.585 (0.556)	0.000***	Supported	0.320 (0.442)	0.000***	Supported	0.265	−2.519**	Supported

RegressionPath	High CT			Low CT			High – Low CTPath differences comparison
RegressionPath	UnstandardisedCoefficients; β	p	Result	UnstandardisedCoefficients; β	p	Result	Differences	Z-score	Result
H8a: PQ → CS	−0.142 (−0.125)	0.299	NS	0.196 (0.188)	0.113	NS	−0.338	1.835	NS
H8b: SQ → CS	0.363 (0.373)	0.000***	Supported	0.001 (0.001)	0.995	NS	0.362	−3.182***	Supported
H8c: PV → CS	0.619 (0.571)	0.000***	Supported	0.299 (0.316)	0.000***	Supported	0.320	−2.161**	Supported
H8d: PQ → BI	0.015 (0.013)	0.901	NS	−0.040 (−0.053)	0.662	NS	0.055	−0.362	NS
H8e: SQ → BI	0.324 (0.316)	0.000***	Supported	0.180 (0.307)	0.003***	Supported	0.144	−1.456	NS
H8f: PV → BI	0.097 (0.085)	0.412	NS	0.078 (0.113)	0.219	NS	0.019	−0.142	NS
H8g: CS → BI	0.585 (0.556)	0.000***	Supported	0.320 (0.442)	0.000***	Supported	0.265	−2.519**	Supported

Note(s): **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01; NS: no support. Standardised coefficients are written in parentheses

Source(s): Author's own creation/work