Table 5 Assessment of structural model...

Table 5

Assessment of structural model [Bootstrapping and Blindfolding procedures]

Data set	Path	Std. Beta	Std. Error	t-value	Confidence interval bias corrected		Decision	VIF	f²	R²	Q²
Data set	Path	Std. Beta	Std. Error	t-value	LB (5%)	UB (95%)	Decision	VIF	f²	R²	Q²
Global	H1: Performance Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.452	0.452	7.184***	0.348	0.554	Accept	2.166	0.174	0.458	0.402
	H2: Effort Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.059	0.059	1.012 ns	−0.037	0.155	Reject	1.938	0.003
	H3: Facilitating Condition → Intention to Digitalize	0.197	0.199	3.713***	0.107	0.283	Accept	1.611	0.045
	H4: Competitive Pressure → Intention to Digitalize	0.121	0.119	2.742**	0.05	0.196	Accept	1.141	0.024
Czech	H1: Performance Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.479	0.481	4.255***	0.272	0.648	Accept	1.882	0.220	0.447	0.352
	H2: Effort Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.014	0.011	0.119 ns	−0.176	0.206	Reject	1.798	0.000
	H3: Facilitating Condition → Intention to Digitalize	0.244	0.249	2.225*	0.051	0.412	Accept	1.500	0.072
	H4: Competitive Pressure → Intention to Digitalize	0.072	0.073	0.886 ns	−0.06	0.206	Reject	1.367	0.007
Slovak	H1: Performance Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.282	0.277	1.652 ns	0.038	0.605	Reject	3.334	0.037	0.359	0.251
	H2: Effort Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.085	0.088	0.458 ns	−0.253	0.359	Reject	2.996	0.004
	H3: Facilitating Condition → Intention to Digitalize	0.248	0.258	2.022*	0.043	0.443	Accept	1.839	0.052
	H4: Competitive Pressure → Intention to Digitalize	0.144	0.14	1.32 ns	−0.039	0.327	Reject	1.139	0.028

Data set	Path	Std. Beta	Std. Error	t-value	Confidence interval bias corrected		Decision	VIF	f²	R²	Q²
Data set	Path	Std. Beta	Std. Error	t-value	LB (5%)	UB (95%)	Decision	VIF	f²	R²	Q²
Global	H1: Performance Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.452	0.452	7.184***	0.348	0.554	Accept	2.166	0.174	0.458	0.402
	H2: Effort Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.059	0.059	1.012 ns	−0.037	0.155	Reject	1.938	0.003
	H3: Facilitating Condition → Intention to Digitalize	0.197	0.199	3.713***	0.107	0.283	Accept	1.611	0.045
	H4: Competitive Pressure → Intention to Digitalize	0.121	0.119	2.742**	0.05	0.196	Accept	1.141	0.024
Czech	H1: Performance Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.479	0.481	4.255***	0.272	0.648	Accept	1.882	0.220	0.447	0.352
	H2: Effort Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.014	0.011	0.119 ns	−0.176	0.206	Reject	1.798	0.000
	H3: Facilitating Condition → Intention to Digitalize	0.244	0.249	2.225*	0.051	0.412	Accept	1.500	0.072
	H4: Competitive Pressure → Intention to Digitalize	0.072	0.073	0.886 ns	−0.06	0.206	Reject	1.367	0.007
Slovak	H1: Performance Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.282	0.277	1.652 ns	0.038	0.605	Reject	3.334	0.037	0.359	0.251
	H2: Effort Expectancy → Intention to Digitalize	0.085	0.088	0.458 ns	−0.253	0.359	Reject	2.996	0.004
	H3: Facilitating Condition → Intention to Digitalize	0.248	0.258	2.022*	0.043	0.443	Accept	1.839	0.052
	H4: Competitive Pressure → Intention to Digitalize	0.144	0.14	1.32 ns	−0.039	0.327	Reject	1.139	0.028

Note(s): NB: * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001; ns = non-significance. The Table reports the results of the structural model for each of the three datasets (global, Czech and Slovak)

Source(s): Table by authors

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable