Table 3 Correlation of... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Correlation of numerical–numerical variables using Pearson correlation

Numerical variables 1–11	Numerical variables 2–11
Numerical variables 1–11	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1. Unit load per week
2. Production deviation		−0.71	0.10
3. Order life cycle
4. Take rate				0.52	0.54	0.53
5. Forecasted volume (8 weeks)					0.94	0.94
6. Forecasted volume (2 weeks)						0.97
7. Reference volume
8. sMAPE (8 weeks)								−0.19	0.28	0.13
9. Log accuracy ratio (8 weeks)									0.18	0.39
10. sMAPE (2 weeks)										0.15
11. Log accuracy ratio (2 weeks)

Numerical variables 1–11	Numerical variables 2–11
Numerical variables 1–11	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1. Unit load per week
2. Production deviation		−0.71	0.10
3. Order life cycle
4. Take rate				0.52	0.54	0.53
5. Forecasted volume (8 weeks)					0.94	0.94
6. Forecasted volume (2 weeks)						0.97
7. Reference volume
8. sMAPE (8 weeks)								−0.19	0.28	0.13
9. Log accuracy ratio (8 weeks)									0.18	0.39
10. sMAPE (2 weeks)										0.15
11. Log accuracy ratio (2 weeks)

Note(s): Correlation values < 0.10 are excluded