Variable description and source
| Variable | Definition | Measurements | Time period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GROW | Per capita growth rate of real GDP, which represents economic growth | Percentage | 1980–2022 | World Development (2022) |
| MINE | Mineral rents share in the GDP [Total natural resources rents as a percentage of GDP] | Percentage | 1980–2022 | World Development (2022) |
| POPR | Population growth rate | Percentage | 1980–2022 | World Development (2022) |
| CIVI | Prevalent of civil war | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Polity IV Index of Regime Change, Centre for Systemic Peace (2021) |
| BORD | Number of countries sharing borders with the country | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Polity IV Index of Regime Change, Centre for Systemic Peace (2021) |
| PGCW | Population growth rate * prevalent of civil war [composite variable] | Percentage | 1980–2022 | World Development (2022) and Polity IV Index of Regime Change, Centre for Systemic Peace (2021) |
| MRWC | Mineral rents * prevalent of civil war [composite variable] | Percentage | 1980–2022 | World Development (2022) and Polity IV Index of Regime Change, Centre for Systemic Peace (2021) |
| DEMO | Democratic institution quality | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Polity IV Index of regime change-Centre for Systemic Peace (2021) |
| EFGI* | Effectiveness of governance institutional quality | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | World Governance Indicators, Kaufmann et al. (2010) In World Development (2022) |
| QAIS* | Quality of accountability institution | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | World Governance Indicators, Kaufmann et al. (2010) In World Development (2022) |
| ICWU | Intensity of civil war (Uppsala Model) | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Violent Political Protest: Introducing a New Uppsala Conflict Data Program Data set on Organized Violence, Svensson et al. (2022) |
| DVSW | Dummy variable for severity of civil war (Uppsala Model) | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Author's estimation derived from: data on Violent Political Protest: Introducing a New Uppsala Conflict Data Program Data set on Organized Violence, Svensson et al. (2022) |
| Variable | Definition | Measurements | Time period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GROW | Per capita growth rate of real GDP, which represents economic growth | Percentage | 1980–2022 | |
| MINE | Mineral rents share in the GDP [Total natural resources rents as a percentage of GDP] | Percentage | 1980–2022 | |
| POPR | Population growth rate | Percentage | 1980–2022 | |
| CIVI | Prevalent of civil war | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Polity IV Index of Regime Change, |
| BORD | Number of countries sharing borders with the country | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Polity IV Index of Regime Change, |
| PGCW | Population growth rate * prevalent of civil war [composite variable] | Percentage | 1980–2022 | |
| MRWC | Mineral rents * prevalent of civil war [composite variable] | Percentage | 1980–2022 | |
| DEMO | Democratic institution quality | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Polity IV Index of regime change- |
| EFGI* | Effectiveness of governance institutional quality | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | World Governance Indicators, |
| QAIS* | Quality of accountability institution | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | World Governance Indicators, |
| ICWU | Intensity of civil war (Uppsala Model) | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Violent Political Protest: Introducing a New Uppsala Conflict Data Program Data set on Organized Violence, |
| DVSW | Dummy variable for severity of civil war (Uppsala Model) | Numerical or Point value | 1980–2022 | Author's estimation derived from: data on Violent Political Protest: Introducing a New Uppsala Conflict Data Program Data set on Organized Violence, |
Note(s): ** The two variables consist of data with availability from 2001. This study uses multiple imputation commands (See Colin and Pravin, 2012, pp. 47–48) in Stata 17 to input the missing values for the series. Moreover, the two variables were not used as part of the study's empirical result but only utilized to compute our robustness test to augment other governance indicators or qualities of institutions used, like the democratic quality of institutions with complete series
Source(s): Author's compilations
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.