Construct operationalization
| Constructs | Measurement items | Factor loading (FL) | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| New venture legitimacy diffusion beyond existing EE | Our venture’s products/services gained much recognition outside our ecosystem | 0.84 | Tost (2011), Kahneman (2011), Kuratko et al. (2017), Bloodgood et al. (2017), McKnight and Zietsma (2018) |
| We secured business partners outside our existing ecosystem | 0.91 | ||
| We engaged more efforts to advertise our products/services beyond existing markets and ecosystem | 0.77 | ||
| We received feedback from customers outside our ecosystem regarding the quality of our products/services | 0.83 | ||
| New venture passive local legitimacy within existing EE | The community automatically validated our company because we aligned with their cultural expectations | 0.86 | Fisher (2020), Kuratko et al. (2017), Tost (2011), Kahneman (2011), Zimmerman and Zeitz (2002) |
| The community engaged minimal effort to understand precisely what our company was doing | 0.79 | ||
| We did not receive any challenges from the community regarding the products/services we offer | 0.91 | ||
| Our company was readily accepted as we met their expectations | 0.85 | ||
| New venture Active local legitimacy within existing EE | The community consciously invested time and energy to legitimize (understand) our company | 0.75 | Kuratko et al. (2017), McKnight and Zietsma (2018), Tost (2011), Kahneman (2011), Zimmerman and Zeitz (2002) |
| The community engaged in cognitive efforts to validate our company | 0.88 | ||
| We received several challenges regarding the products/services we offer | 0.87 | ||
| The community carefully and deliberately assessed our venture and its relatedness to the environment | 0.93 | ||
| Legitimacy brokerage | We actively seek media coverage and public relations opportunities to increase our visibility and credibility | 0.89 | Fisher (2020), Kuratko et al. (2017), Burt (2007), Davies and Prince (2005) |
| We often participate in industry events, conferences, or exhibitions to enhance our visibility and credibility | 0.94 | ||
| Individuals spread information regarding our products/services even beyond our ecosystem | 0.80 | ||
| Individuals discuss the quality of our products/services in their networks even beyond our ecosystem | 0.81 | ||
| Individuals regularly share potential information about our products within and beyond our ecosystem | 0.79 | ||
| Network activities | Occurrence of network events such as meet-ups, startup weekends, conferences, pitch competitions | 0.71 | Bloodgood et al. (2017), Kuratko et al. (2017), Motoyama and Knowlton (2017), Jensen (2008) |
| Connections among actors within and beyond the existing ecosystem | 0.76 | ||
| Social ties among actors within and beyond the existing ecosystem | 0.69 | ||
| Interactions among actors within and beyond the existing ecosystem | 0.81 | ||
| We had to persuade the government to design new regulations that favor our products | 0.88 | ||
| We had to create a new social context for our venture | 0.80 | ||
| We created ecosystem partners that better understand our products/services | 0.73 |
| Constructs | Measurement items | Factor loading (FL) | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| New venture legitimacy diffusion beyond existing EE | Our venture’s products/services gained much recognition outside our ecosystem | 0.84 | |
| We secured business partners outside our existing ecosystem | 0.91 | ||
| We engaged more efforts to advertise our products/services beyond existing markets and ecosystem | 0.77 | ||
| We received feedback from customers outside our ecosystem regarding the quality of our products/services | 0.83 | ||
| New venture passive local legitimacy within existing EE | The community automatically validated our company because we aligned with their cultural expectations | 0.86 | |
| The community engaged minimal effort to understand precisely what our company was doing | 0.79 | ||
| We did not receive any challenges from the community regarding the products/services we offer | 0.91 | ||
| Our company was readily accepted as we met their expectations | 0.85 | ||
| New venture Active local legitimacy within existing EE | The community consciously invested time and energy to legitimize (understand) our company | 0.75 | |
| The community engaged in cognitive efforts to validate our company | 0.88 | ||
| We received several challenges regarding the products/services we offer | 0.87 | ||
| The community carefully and deliberately assessed our venture and its relatedness to the environment | 0.93 | ||
| Legitimacy brokerage | We actively seek media coverage and public relations opportunities to increase our visibility and credibility | 0.89 | |
| We often participate in industry events, conferences, or exhibitions to enhance our visibility and credibility | 0.94 | ||
| Individuals spread information regarding our products/services even beyond our ecosystem | 0.80 | ||
| Individuals discuss the quality of our products/services in their networks even beyond our ecosystem | 0.81 | ||
| Individuals regularly share potential information about our products within and beyond our ecosystem | 0.79 | ||
| Network activities | Occurrence of network events such as meet-ups, startup weekends, conferences, pitch competitions | 0.71 | |
| Connections among actors within and beyond the existing ecosystem | 0.76 | ||
| Social ties among actors within and beyond the existing ecosystem | 0.69 | ||
| Interactions among actors within and beyond the existing ecosystem | 0.81 | ||
| We had to persuade the government to design new regulations that favor our products | 0.88 | ||
| We had to create a new social context for our venture | 0.80 | ||
| We created ecosystem partners that better understand our products/services | 0.73 |
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.