Table 4

Pairwise correlations

Variables(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)
(1) Carbon emissions1.000             
(2) Financial constraints0.078***1.000            
(3) Board gender diversity0.0230.0211.000           
(4) Policy emissions reduction0.300***−0.0090.096***1.000          
(5) Eco-innovation score0.135***−0.004−0.0320.133***1.000         
(6) Environmental expenditure0.094***0.330***−0.0350.048*0.0191.000        
(7) Executive gender diversity−0.056**0.156***0.046*−0.026−0.054**0.045*1.000       
(8) Human rights policy0.0020.242***0.0300.019−0.0080.322***0.096***1.000      
(9) Board size0.322***0.0120.100***0.215***0.148***0.065***−0.0380.0151.000     
(10) Policy board diversity0.009−0.0160.355***0.162***0.053**−0.0250.0230.0340.161***1.000    
(11) Independent board director0.140***−0.0100.084***0.048**0.080***−0.019−0.0150.0020.200***0.244***1.000   
(12) Leverage0.0270.057**−0.062**−0.0090.0040.150***−0.170***0.152***0.048*−0.020−0.0031.000  
(13) Board-specific skills−0.166***−0.072***−0.037−0.108***−0.044*−0.103***0.011−0.086***−0.194***0.012−0.089***−0.0071.000 
(14) Return on asset0.059**−0.185***−0.070***0.027−0.0350.164***−0.097***0.220***0.015−0.0320.0000.215***−0.0391.000

Notes:

***, ** and * represent the significance level at 99, 95 and 90%, respectively

Source: Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal