Table 2

Regression results for models predicting IWB

Model 1Model 2Model 3
bSEbSEbSE
Age  0.010.01−0.010.00
Employee gender (1 = female)  0.18**0.070.20**0.07
Sector (1 = public and nonprofit)  0.060.080.050.09
Education  −0.010.04−0.010.05
Transformational leadership  0.25***0.040.27***0.05
PMS strength configuration
LHL−0.060.14−0.080.13−0.080.13
LLH−0.040.15−0.050.13−0.070.14
HHL−0.020.14−0.010.140.010.13
HLH−0.130.140.100.140.110.13
LHH0.080.130.100.140.110.12
HLL−0.32*0.15−0.28**0.13−0.240.15
HHH0.41***0.110.40***0.130.40***0.11
LHL × Transformational leadership    0.0120.20
LLH × Transformational leadership    0.35*0.17
HHL × Transformational leadership    −0.200.14
HLH × Transformational leadership    0.160.14
LHH × Transformational leadership    0.0170.18
HLL × Transformational leadership    0.180.17
HHH × Transformational leadership    −0.090.13
F5.19***6.55***4.88***
R20.070.160.19
Adjusted R20.050.130.07

Note(s): *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01***p < 0.00. For the interactions and main effects, the LLL scenario (i.e. absence of PMS strength) serves as reference category; n = 444

Source(s): Authors' own work

[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal