Post-hoc regression results for models predicting IWB
| IWB | ||
|---|---|---|
| b | SE | |
| Age | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Employee gender (1 = female) | 0.21** | 0.07 |
| Sector (1 = public and nonprofit) | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| Education | −0.01 | 0.05 |
| Transformational leadership | 0.28*** | 0.05 |
| PMS strength | ||
| PMS distinctiveness | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| PMS consistency | 0.18** | 0.14 |
| PMS consensus | 0.24*** | 0.13 |
| Transformational leadership × PMS Distinctiveness | −0.10 | 0.20 |
| LLH × Transformational leadership × PMS Consistency | −0.16 | 0.17 |
| HHL × Transformational leadership × PMS Consensus | 0.17* | 0.14 |
| F | 6.41*** | |
| R2 | 0.14 | |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.12 | |
| IWB | ||
|---|---|---|
| SE | ||
| Age | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Employee gender (1 = female) | 0.21** | 0.07 |
| Sector (1 = public and nonprofit) | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| Education | −0.01 | 0.05 |
| Transformational leadership | 0.28*** | 0.05 |
| PMS distinctiveness | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| PMS consistency | 0.18** | 0.14 |
| PMS consensus | 0.24*** | 0.13 |
| Transformational leadership × PMS Distinctiveness | −0.10 | 0.20 |
| LLH × Transformational leadership × PMS Consistency | −0.16 | 0.17 |
| HHL × Transformational leadership × PMS Consensus | 0.17* | 0.14 |
| F | 6.41*** | |
| 0.14 | ||
| Adjusted | 0.12 | |
Note(s): *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01***p < 0.00; n = 444
Source(s): Authors' own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.