Table 2 Comparison of vibration... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

Comparison of vibration reduction between traditional and active shock absorbers

Param	Traditional		Active		Improvement
Param	Max err	IAE	Max err	IAE	Max err	IAE
$x$ [m]	0.0044	0.0071	0.0034	0.0034	−22.7%	−52.1%
$y$ [m]	0.0128	0.0589	0.0073	0.013	−42.9%	−77.9%
$α$ [deg]	0.0012	0.0035	0.0012	0.003	0%	−14.3%
$β$ [deg]	0.0013	0.0012	0.0009	0.0023	−30.7%	91.7%
$θ$ [deg]	0.0039	0.0146	0.0026	0.0033	−33.3%	−77.4%

Param	Traditional		Active		Improvement
Param	Max err	IAE	Max err	IAE	Max err	IAE
$x$ [m]	0.0044	0.0071	0.0034	0.0034	−22.7%	−52.1%
$y$ [m]	0.0128	0.0589	0.0073	0.013	−42.9%	−77.9%
$α$ [deg]	0.0012	0.0035	0.0012	0.003	0%	−14.3%
$β$ [deg]	0.0013	0.0012	0.0009	0.0023	−30.7%	91.7%
$θ$ [deg]	0.0039	0.0146	0.0026	0.0033	−33.3%	−77.4%

Source(s): Authors' own work