Table 1.

The MSFC – basic features, ambidexterity and resilience

AspectObservation
Changes in configurations of the cluster
Regulatory framework
Technology
Society/policy
– Before: Few influences of changing framework conditions
– Environmental regulations
Technology
– Before: New steels mainly used in coatings
– Possibility of new steels also in massive steel applications
Production and
innovation regime
Markets
– Before: Tendencies: Outsourcing at the side of the OEMs and systems suppliers; substantial cost pressure
– New tendencies: E-mobility, new markets (wind turbines), competition from China
Collaboration
– Before: Rather low degree of cooperation
– Increased cooperation (industrial collective research as framework)
Observations regarding ambidexterity and resilience
AmbidexterityFirm level
– From the beginning different degrees of ambidexterity
– R&D intensive firms, others working just based on engineering drawings
– Some firms already developed into new markets
Cluster level
– Lock-in in the automotive value chain; modest role of new markets
– Low degree of cooperation; exception: industrial collective research
ResilienceIndividual firm: low degree of resilience
– Before: Mostly low potential resilience because of fixed position in the value chain (exception: few mostly large firms)
– No way to influence the changing car design; alternative markets are small
Cluster
– As with firms: Stable position over a long period of time, but no resilience to potential outside shocks
– Changing situation: Only partly possibility to open up new markets
– Ambidexterity can only partly (for some firms) ensure resilience because of shrinking market size for massive forging products
Sources: Own depiction, based on expert interviews with forging firms, firms in other parts of the value chain and representatives from research organisations

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options