Cross-sectional analysis of Big 4 audit
| Variable | DM | |
|---|---|---|
| (1) Non-Big 4 audit | (2) Big 4 audit | |
| Open | 0.0632*** | −0.0217 |
| (2.87) | (−0.31) | |
| Size | 0.0956*** | 0.0820 |
| (9.83) | (1.46) | |
| ROA | −0.0152 | −0.2739 |
| (−0.17) | (−0.65) | |
| Growth | −0.0095** | 0.0227 |
| (−2.19) | (0.89) | |
| Lev | 0.0833** | −0.1325 |
| (2.08) | (−0.55) | |
| AM | 0.0217 | −0.0938 |
| (0.43) | (−0.44) | |
| CFO | 0.1509*** | 0.2885 |
| (3.48) | (1.46) | |
| Top1 | 0.0014** | 0.0030 |
| (2.45) | (1.28) | |
| Dual | −0.0153 | 0.0249 |
| (−1.52) | (0.69) | |
| QFII | 0.1950 | 4.8720* |
| (0.24) | (1.67) | |
| Constant | −1.8444*** | −1.4476 |
| (−8.68) | (−1.09) | |
| Firm FE | Control | Control |
| Year FE | Control | Control |
| R2 | 0.2056 | 0.2227 |
| N | 9,943 | 408 |
| Variable | DM | |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | |
| Open | 0.0632*** | −0.0217 |
| (2.87) | (−0.31) | |
| Size | 0.0956*** | 0.0820 |
| (9.83) | (1.46) | |
| ROA | −0.0152 | −0.2739 |
| (−0.17) | (−0.65) | |
| Growth | −0.0095** | 0.0227 |
| (−2.19) | (0.89) | |
| Lev | 0.0833** | −0.1325 |
| (2.08) | (−0.55) | |
| AM | 0.0217 | −0.0938 |
| (0.43) | (−0.44) | |
| CFO | 0.1509*** | 0.2885 |
| (3.48) | (1.46) | |
| Top1 | 0.0014** | 0.0030 |
| (2.45) | (1.28) | |
| Dual | −0.0153 | 0.0249 |
| (−1.52) | (0.69) | |
| QFII | 0.1950 | 4.8720* |
| (0.24) | (1.67) | |
| Constant | −1.8444*** | −1.4476 |
| (−8.68) | (−1.09) | |
| Firm FE | Control | Control |
| Year FE | Control | Control |
| 0.2056 | 0.2227 | |
| 9,943 | 408 | |
Note(s): This table presents the regression results of the cross-sectional analysis of Big 4 audit. Variable definitions are available in Appendix 2. T-values are reported in parentheses. ***, ** and * denote statistical significance at the 1, 5 and 10% levels, respectively
Source(s): Table by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.