Table 1

Overview of source credibility research regarding influencers

StudyStimuliNExogenous variableEndogenous variableTypology of trust
Munnukka et al. (2016)3 ads364Attractivity
Expertise
Trust
Similarity
Ad attitude
Brand attitude
No
Xiao et al. (2018)497Sympathy
Expertise
Trust
Similarity
Interactivity
Quality of arguments
Brand attitude video attitudeNo
Breves et al. (2019) 1 influencer × 1 brand687
197
Attractivity
Expertise
Trust
Congruence
Brand attitude
Behavioral intention
No
Lou and Yuan (2019) 538Attractivity
Expertise
Trust
Similarity
Information
Entertainment
Trust (post)
Brand awareness
Purchase intention
No
Reinikainen et al. (2020) 1 influencer × 1 brand302Parasocial relationCredibility (influencer)
Brand trust
Purchase intention
No
Schouten et al. (2020) 4 influencer × 2 products131
446
Expertise
Trust
Similarity
Projection
Congruence
Ad attitude
Product attitude
Purchase intention
No
Weismueller et al. (2020) 10 influencers306Attractivity
Expertise
Trust
Purchase intentionNo
Yuan and Lou (2020)  Expertise
Attractivity
Trust
Similarity
Fairness
Parasocial relationship
Product interest
No
Wiedmann and von Mettenheim (2021) 1 brand; 2 × 2 × 2 per exogenous variable288Attractivity
Expertise
Trust
Purchase intention
Price premium
No
Masuda et al. (2022)  313Homophily
Attractivity
Expertise
Trust
Parasocial rel
Purchase intentionNo
Dhun and Dangi (2023) 1 influencer383Attractivity
Expertise
Trust
Similarity
Congruence
Brand attitude
eWOM
No
Present study2 influencers × 2 products414Attractivity
Expertise
Typology of trust
Attitude influencerYes
Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options