Relevant insurance motives regarding financial benefits, agency problems and organizational characteristics for large enterprises vs SMEs
| Findings for large organizations | Findings for SMEs | |
|---|---|---|
| Financial aspects |
|
|
| Agency problems/information asymmetries | Between bondholders and shareholders Differing interests between debtholders and shareholders can lead to an underinvestment problem. By requiring insurance, debtholders limit a firm’s risk to a certain level while reducing the agency costs of monitoring the behavior of the equity holders and increasing firm value (e.g. [2], [3], [4], [12]) – other results found by [7] Between management and shareholders Insurers have a comparative advantage in monitoring risk-reducing decisions made by management for shareholders [1], with the degree of risk aversion of managers depending on the extent to which compensation is linked to performance (e.g. [4], [6], [13]) Relationship with others
| Between bondholders and shareholders
Between management and shareholders In SMEs, a separation between ownership and management is often not possible (e.g. [8],[16]). Therefore, the risk management motives of owners and managers are much more aligned [18]: the owners of closely held organizations have greater control over management behavior than those of widely held organizations [8] |
| Organizational aspects | Ownership structure Corporations purchase less insurance than closely held firms with concentrated ownership (e.g. [1], [6], [8], [11]) – other results found by [9] and [10] Organizational size Smaller enterprises purchase more insurance than larger organizations (e.g. [1], [4], [8], [9], [10], [11]) – other results found by [6] Industry
| Ownership structure For SMEs a negative relation between ownership concentration and insurance demand and a positive one between the number of family owners and insurance demand has been identified [18] – other results found by [16]: the importance of financial benefits as an insurance motive varies with the ownership structure Organizational size Smaller SMEs purchase less insurance than larger ones (e.g. [16], [17]) Industry Organizations in trading and manufacturing industries purchase more business interruption insurance [17] Other characteristics Growth potential is not significantly related to insurance demand in SMEs, probably because SMEs with growth expectations do not have sufficient financial resources to purchase insurance [16] |
| Findings for large organizations | Findings for SMEs | |
|---|---|---|
| Financial aspects | Insurance can reduce the Purchasing insurance depends on the Insurance is purchased to achieve Insurance is purchased to reduce taxable income and expected tax liabilities (e.g. [1],[4], [9]) – other results found by [7] and [10]. The German tax system offers limited opportunities to reduce the tax burden through insurance [8] | Smaller firms purchase insurance to Tax incentives have been shown to be a motive for purchasing insurance among Japanese SMEs [16] |
| Agency problems/information asymmetries | Insurance is motivated by competition and can facilitate cooperation and coordination (e.g. [14]) Insurance can act as a signal of firm quality – greater levels of coverage signal higher expected cash flows (e.g. [7], [15]) | Insurance could be used to strengthen the existing relationship: insurance demand within private firms is motivated by increasing the organization’s debt capacity [18] due to the high importance of bank borrowings (which are the main sources of financing) for SMEs. Those facing financial constraints due to weak relationships with their banks tend to have a higher insurance demand [16] Insurance is often purchased by SMEs at the request of banks [16] |
| Organizational aspects | Regulated firms purchase more insurance than unregulated firms (e.g. [1], [6], [9], [10]) – other results by [4] Firms from industries where higher operating revenues are associated with a higher insurance risk purchase insurance (e.g. [15]) Organizations with greater Firms with greater Insurance is purchased due to |
Note(s): [1] Mayers and Smith (1982), [2] Mayers and Smith (1987), [3] MacMinn (1987), [4] Hoyt and Khang (2000), [5] Aunon-Nerin and Ehling (2008), [6] Core (1997), [7] Main (1983), [8] Krummaker (2019), [9] Regan and Hur (2007), [10] Yamori (1999), [11] Krummaker and Graf von der Schulenburg (2008), [12] Davidson et al. (1992), [13] Han (1996), [14] Ashby and Diacon (1998), [15] Grace and Rebello (1993), [16] Asai (2019), [17] Hoppe et al. (2017), [18] Ehling (2013)
Source(s): Authors own creation
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.