Table 2. Regression coefficients of...

Table 2.

Regression coefficients of compassion’s effects on FtF negotiations vs CMC

	FtF (n = 78 dyads)				CMC (n = 49 dyads)				comparison
Independent and dependent measures	β_Sun	SE_Sun	β_Pan	SE_Pan	β_Sun	SE_Sun	β_Pan	S E_Pan	χ²_Sun	χ²_Pan
Model 2
Compassion → Power	0.04	0.14	−0.04	0.12	−0.19	0.14	−0.30*	0.12	1.35	1.66
Compassion → Rights	0.14	0.13	0.05	0.12	−0.17	0.15	−0.11	0.15	2.93⁺	0.77
Compassion → Interest	0.15	0.11	0.11	0.10	0.25*	0.14	0.39***	0.12	0.50	2.80⁺
Power → RelationA	−0.27**	0.08	−0.40***	0.12	−0.26*	0.13	−0.26*	0.16	0.18	0.50
Rights → RelationA	0.11	0.09	0.31***	0.12	−0.02	0.12	0.05	0.12	0.58	3.60⁺
Interests → RelationA	0.43***	0.10	0.46***	0.12	−0.08	0.13	0.34*	0.15	10.69***	0.93
Power → RelationP	−0.14	0.09	−0.31**	0.11	−0.11	0.15	−0.13	0.14	0.00	0.97
Rights → RelationP	0.11	0.09	0.26**	0.11	−0.21⁺	0.14	−0.06	0.11	4.50*	4.63*
Interests → RelationP	0.06	0.11	0.13	0.11	−0.01	0.15	0.53***	0.13	0.18	6.11*
Model 4a
Compassion → Threats	−0.02	0.13	0.06	0.11	−0.23**	0.16	−0.20*	0.14	1.36	2.17
Threats → RelationA	−0.30**	0.10	−0.23*	0.15	−0.36**	0.12	−0.31*	0.15	0.24	0.04
Threats → RelationP	−0.14	0.12	−0.20⁺	0.13	−0.24⁺	0.14	−0.36**	0.13	0.31	0.59
Model 4b
Compassion → Enhance	0.10	0.11	0.17	0.09	0.34**	0.12	0.49***	0.12	1.38	5.86*
Enhance → RelationA	0.71***	0.07	0.75***	0.11	0.44***	0.14	0.61***	0.12	0.70	1.12
Enhance → RelationP	0.12	0.08	0.18*	0.10	0.11	0.17	0.45***	0.10	0.01	2.07

	FtF (n = 78 dyads)				CMC (n = 49 dyads)				comparison
Independent and dependent measures	β_Sun	SE_Sun	β_Pan	SE_Pan	β_Sun	SE_Sun	β_Pan	S E_Pan	χ²_Sun	χ²_Pan
Model 2
Compassion → Power	0.04	0.14	−0.04	0.12	−0.19	0.14	−0.30*	0.12	1.35	1.66
Compassion → Rights	0.14	0.13	0.05	0.12	−0.17	0.15	−0.11	0.15	2.93⁺	0.77
Compassion → Interest	0.15	0.11	0.11	0.10	0.25*	0.14	0.39***	0.12	0.50	2.80⁺
Power → RelationA	−0.27**	0.08	−0.40***	0.12	−0.26*	0.13	−0.26*	0.16	0.18	0.50
Rights → RelationA	0.11	0.09	0.31***	0.12	−0.02	0.12	0.05	0.12	0.58	3.60⁺
Interests → RelationA	0.43***	0.10	0.46***	0.12	−0.08	0.13	0.34*	0.15	10.69***	0.93
Power → RelationP	−0.14	0.09	−0.31**	0.11	−0.11	0.15	−0.13	0.14	0.00	0.97
Rights → RelationP	0.11	0.09	0.26**	0.11	−0.21⁺	0.14	−0.06	0.11	4.50*	4.63*
Interests → RelationP	0.06	0.11	0.13	0.11	−0.01	0.15	0.53***	0.13	0.18	6.11*
Model 4a
Compassion → Threats	−0.02	0.13	0.06	0.11	−0.23**	0.16	−0.20*	0.14	1.36	2.17
Threats → RelationA	−0.30**	0.10	−0.23*	0.15	−0.36**	0.12	−0.31*	0.15	0.24	0.04
Threats → RelationP	−0.14	0.12	−0.20⁺	0.13	−0.24⁺	0.14	−0.36**	0.13	0.31	0.59
Model 4b
Compassion → Enhance	0.10	0.11	0.17	0.09	0.34**	0.12	0.49***	0.12	1.38	5.86*
Enhance → RelationA	0.71***	0.07	0.75***	0.11	0.44***	0.14	0.61***	0.12	0.70	1.12
Enhance → RelationP	0.12	0.08	0.18*	0.10	0.11	0.17	0.45***	0.10	0.01	2.07

Notes:

RelationA = actor’s relational outcome; RelationP = partner’s relational outcome; Sun and Pan are two members of the negotiation dyad. +p < 0.10; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Source: Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable