Table 2 Interval distribution of... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

Interval distribution of efficiency scores for each cluster

Efficiency score	% of municipalities
	North				Center				South
	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
[0–0.1)	0.9	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.8	0.0	0.0	2.1	1.0	0.0	0.0
[0.1–0.2)	9.9	4.8	4.7	1.5	5.4	4.2	1.2	0.0	22.4	25.2	10.9	20.0
[0.2–0.3)	27.4	33.6	26.7	18.2	14.7	23.5	19.8	7.4	29.4	31.1	33.9	30.3
[0.3–0.4)	25.1	26.9	28.6	33.1	14.0	16.8	14.8	16.7	16.4	15.5	19.4	20.0
[0.4–0.5)	14.6	15.1	18.6	19.3	14.7	16.0	11.1	16.7	8.8	6.8	10.9	9.0
[0.5–0.6)	6.4	7.4	10.3	11.0	14.0	15.1	13.6	11.1	6.1	5.8	8.5	4.5
[0.6–0.7)	4.7	3.6	3.8	5.6	9.3	4.2	14.8	13.0	3.9	3.9	3.6	4.5
[0.7–0.8)	2.9	3.6	2.3	2.9	8.5	4.2	6.2	9.3	3.6	1.9	4.8	1.9
[0.8–0.9)	2.0	1.9	2.3	2.7	3.1	3.4	8.6	5.6	1.5	1.5	0.6	1.9
[0.9–1)	1.2	1.3	0.5	2.4	4.7	2.5	0.0	1.9	2.1	1.5	0.6	0.6
1	5.0	1.7	2.2	3.4	11.6	9.2	9.9	18.5	3.6	5.8	6.7	7.1
Total	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100
<0.5	77.8	80.7	78.6	72.1	48.8	61.3	46.9	40.7	79.1	79.6	75.2	79.4

Efficiency score	% of municipalities
	North				Center				South
	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
[0–0.1)	0.9	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.8	0.0	0.0	2.1	1.0	0.0	0.0
[0.1–0.2)	9.9	4.8	4.7	1.5	5.4	4.2	1.2	0.0	22.4	25.2	10.9	20.0
[0.2–0.3)	27.4	33.6	26.7	18.2	14.7	23.5	19.8	7.4	29.4	31.1	33.9	30.3
[0.3–0.4)	25.1	26.9	28.6	33.1	14.0	16.8	14.8	16.7	16.4	15.5	19.4	20.0
[0.4–0.5)	14.6	15.1	18.6	19.3	14.7	16.0	11.1	16.7	8.8	6.8	10.9	9.0
[0.5–0.6)	6.4	7.4	10.3	11.0	14.0	15.1	13.6	11.1	6.1	5.8	8.5	4.5
[0.6–0.7)	4.7	3.6	3.8	5.6	9.3	4.2	14.8	13.0	3.9	3.9	3.6	4.5
[0.7–0.8)	2.9	3.6	2.3	2.9	8.5	4.2	6.2	9.3	3.6	1.9	4.8	1.9
[0.8–0.9)	2.0	1.9	2.3	2.7	3.1	3.4	8.6	5.6	1.5	1.5	0.6	1.9
[0.9–1)	1.2	1.3	0.5	2.4	4.7	2.5	0.0	1.9	2.1	1.5	0.6	0.6
1	5.0	1.7	2.2	3.4	11.6	9.2	9.9	18.5	3.6	5.8	6.7	7.1
Total	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100
<0.5	77.8	80.7	78.6	72.1	48.8	61.3	46.9	40.7	79.1	79.6	75.2	79.4

Source(s): Authors own work