Interval distribution of efficiency score before and after outlier removal for cluster “North-2”
| Efficiency score | % of municipalities | |
|---|---|---|
| With outlier | Without outlier | |
| [0–0.1) | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| [0.1–0.2) | 4.8 | 0.0 |
| [0.2–0.3) | 33.6 | 1.0 |
| [0.3–0.4) | 26.9 | 15.6 |
| [0.4–0.5) | 15.1 | 17.1 |
| [0.5–0.6) | 7.4 | 23.2 |
| [0.6–0.7) | 3.6 | 19.4 |
| [0.7–0.8) | 3.6 | 11.5 |
| [0.8–0.9) | 1.9 | 5.4 |
| [0.9–1) | 1.3 | 3.8 |
| 1 | 1.7 | 3.1 |
| Efficiency score | % of municipalities | |
|---|---|---|
| With outlier | Without outlier | |
| [0–0.1) | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| [0.1–0.2) | 4.8 | 0.0 |
| [0.2–0.3) | 33.6 | 1.0 |
| [0.3–0.4) | 26.9 | 15.6 |
| [0.4–0.5) | 15.1 | 17.1 |
| [0.5–0.6) | 7.4 | 23.2 |
| [0.6–0.7) | 3.6 | 19.4 |
| [0.7–0.8) | 3.6 | 11.5 |
| [0.8–0.9) | 1.9 | 5.4 |
| [0.9–1) | 1.3 | 3.8 |
| 1 | 1.7 | 3.1 |
Source(s): Authors own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.