Interview protocol used to collect data from interviewing the CBs
| Interview protocol |
| Interview Title: The influence of the interpretation of ISO 19011 guidelines on conducting TPQA at ISO 9001 certified organisations in South Africa |
| Introduction |
| Biographical Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Instructions to the interviewee (opening statements) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Closing |
| Transition messages for the interviewer: Is there anything to add that would add to the body of knowledge? |
| Interview Title: The influence of the interpretation of ISO 19011 guidelines on conducting TPQA at ISO 9001 certified organisations in South Africa |
| Biographical Information |
Institution/Organisation |
Interviewee (Title and Name) |
What role do you play in your organisation? |
How long have you worked for the organisation? |
Which CBs have you worked for before? |
Are your experiences working for CBs the same? |
How long have you been in a quality position? |
Risks, data collection for research purposes only |
Consent |
Confidentiality: code names and organisation |
Research Ethics Committee (Human) of the University |
Audio recorded |
What elements do you think people look for in audits? |
How are these elements presented in the audit programme guidelines? |
How do you ensure audits are effective and reliable? |
Describe how you apply the guidelines for auditing management systems in third-party quality audits |
How do certification bodies influence the conduct of the audits? |
In what ways can audit quality be compromised? |
How free are programme managers to exercise their judgement in interpreting the audit guidelines? |
What documents are you using together with ISO 17021/19011 in compiling audit guidelines? |
How do you interpret the extent of the audit? |
How do you ensure accomplishment of the objectives is assessed? And what performance indicators are used to determine the accomplishment degree? |
To what extent are audit guidelines you develop more detailed to be understood by auditors to promote audit effectiveness? |
In your opinion how auditee-specific are audit programme procedures? |
Do you think the audit guidelines should be more industry-specific or custom-made or generic? |
What information do you collect from the auditee to guide in the development of the audit programme? |
Based on interpretation of the audit objectives, how can an auditor change the audit methods? |
How do you orientate yourself to the auditee’s site/documentation when setting audit objectives? |
What audit methodologies do you employ to enhance the auditor’s ability to challenge the auditee’s management system? |
What in the guidelines for auditing MS should be enhanced to improve the application in the audit process guidelines? |
To what extent are the risks identified and mitigated? |
How does resource provision impact on the effectiveness of the audit? |
To what extent are technical skills, personal qualities and practical experiences key drivers to audit quality? |
How do you ensure compliance with audit principles? |
How do you measure auditor performance? What techniques are used? |
How do performance reviews within your organisation enhance auditors’ technical expertise? |
How adequately do the programme managers discharge their responsibilities? What might be added or considered to enhance effectiveness? |
Can you take me through the process of declaring programme managers competent to manage the audit programme? |
How often are there disputes from your customers (auditees) regarding the way audits are conducted? |
What suggestions would you make on assessing the audit programme effectiveness? |
How do you maintain audit documents and records? |
Source(s): Author’s own creation
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.