Table 5. Results of discriminant...

Table 5.

Results of discriminant analysis for the factors’ group “support” about their discriminatory potential to divide employed Latvians into proponents and opponents of remote work, n = 534, Feb–Mar 2021

Groups of factors	Factors included in the questionnaire	Results of discriminant analysis
Support for respondents (support from the employer, bonuses received when working remotely)	1) Computer and other necessary IT equipment	p = 0.168
	2) IT support by adapting a computer to work remotely	p = 0.221
	3) Training on how to use tools and software I did not use before	p = 0.154
	4) Support on how to do my job remotely	p = 0.937
	5) I was explained how to arrange a workplace at the computer at home comfortably	p = 0.237
	6) The employer explained the conditions under which I would work	p = 0.667
	7) Reimbursement for costs	p = 0.431
	8) Remote team building events are organised for my team	p = 0.946
	9) My line manager was trained to manage employees remotely	p = 0.681
	10) Training/seminars on how to reduce stress	p = 0.946

Groups of factors	Factors included in the questionnaire	Results of discriminant analysis
Support for respondents (support from the employer, bonuses received when working remotely)	1) Computer and other necessary IT equipment	p = 0.168
	2) IT support by adapting a computer to work remotely	p = 0.221
	3) Training on how to use tools and software I did not use before	p = 0.154
	4) Support on how to do my job remotely	p = 0.937
	5) I was explained how to arrange a workplace at the computer at home comfortably	p = 0.237
	6) The employer explained the conditions under which I would work	p = 0.667
	7) Reimbursement for costs	p = 0.431
	8) Remote team building events are organised for my team	p = 0.946
	9) My line manager was trained to manage employees remotely	p = 0.681
	10) Training/seminars on how to reduce stress	p = 0.946

Source: Calculations based on data from Figure 1, Rīga Stradiņš University (RSU), 2021

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable