Table 2. Goodness of fit and model...

Table 2.

Goodness of fit and model comparison

	CFI (>=0.95)	TLI (>=0.95)	RMSEA (<=0.05)	SRMR (<=0.08)	AIC	BIC	χ²
Task workplace resources as the mediator
Partially mediated model	0.980	0.963	0.056	0.039	6,479,667	6,480,775	38,253
Fully mediated model	0.980	0.964	0.055	0.039	6,479,934	6,481,004	38,527	***
Group workplace resources as the mediator
Partially mediated model	0.984	0.973	0.046	0.038	7,037,892	7,039,019	31,446
Fully mediated model	0.984	0.974	0.045	0.038	7,038,096	7,039,185	31,658	***
Worksite workplace resources as the mediator
Partially mediated model	0.970	0.948	0.064	0.044	7,104,956	7,106,083	60,867
Fully mediated model	0.969	0.95	0.063	0.044	7,105,151	7,106,240	61,069	***

	CFI(>=0.95)	TLI(>=0.95)	RMSEA(<=0.05)	SRMR(<=0.08)	AIC	BIC	χ²
Task workplace resources as the mediator
Partially mediated model	0.980	0.963	0.056	0.039	6,479,667	6,480,775	38,253
Fully mediated model	0.980	0.964	0.055	0.039	6,479,934	6,481,004	38,527	***
Group workplace resources as the mediator
Partially mediated model	0.984	0.973	0.046	0.038	7,037,892	7,039,019	31,446
Fully mediated model	0.984	0.974	0.045	0.038	7,038,096	7,039,185	31,658	***
Worksite workplace resources as the mediator
Partially mediated model	0.970	0.948	0.064	0.044	7,104,956	7,106,083	60,867
Fully mediated model	0.969	0.95	0.063	0.044	7,105,151	7,106,240	61,069	***

Notes:

Model fit indices include the CFI, TLI, RMSEA and SRMR, and the goodness of fit criterion is shown in parentheses. The chi-square difference test results show that partially mediated models fit better than fully mediated models

Source: Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable