Time-averaged performance comparison for each maturity pair
| Tn\TS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5648/11.9618 | 1.3698/21.8410 | 0.7137/22.4873 | 0.5816/18.0907 | 1.0917/16.9350 | 1.5537/16.2323 |
| 2 | 14.3426/12.4134 | 2.4706/7.1413 | 0.6178/8.8432 | 0.9775/11.8410 | 2.7375/15.1261 | 4.3994/16.8990 |
| 3 | 22.0335/21.9966 | 5.9828/7.7694 | 1.2249/4.2516 | 1.3701/5.7262 | 4.3304/9.4019 | 7.4622/12.4973 |
| 5 | 32.4725/34.4908 | 12.5185/17.1694 | 3.9538/10.4634 | 1.1257/10.0113 | 4.7915/13.8504 | 8.3897/16.2631 |
| 7 | 34.7667/30.7702 | 16.2570/13.8607 | 6.8555/8.1459 | 0.8705/10.8151 | 1.9622/16.4478 | 4.2073/21.1314 |
| 10 | 31.3438/22.2418 | 18.1151/9.0601 | 11.5211/5.0799 | 5.6316/6.6442 | 3.9493/12.3443 | 3.8040/21.2147 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 10 |
Note(s): Each cell presents the MSPE of the proposed method (in italicface) versus the benchmark model in percentage terms
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.