Overview of findings: narratives, subnarratives, operational scripts and roles
| Narratives | Subnarratives | Operational scripts and role interpretations |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Work is health-promoting, and you can always do something, even if you are sick |
|
|
| 2. GPs lack an updated and competent view of clients’ work capacity |
|
|
| 3. The sustainability of the welfare state is under pressure, and saving it depends on us |
|
|
| Narratives | Subnarratives | Operational scripts and role interpretations |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Work is health-promoting, and you can always do something, even if you are sick | Clients’ work capacity depends on their functional capacity, not on their diagnosis There is a mismatch between healthcare services and the caseworkers in the interpretation of health and sickness | Caseworkers must be detectives, detecting clients’ work capacity by using lay-person strategies, reading between the lines of medical certificates and client dialogue |
| 2. GPs lack an updated and competent view of clients’ work capacity | GPs need to be better informed “Get hold of the patient before the doctor does!” GPs do not contribute to reducing the average sickness level in society Sick-listing is not the best medicine | Because GPs advocate for their patients’ interests, involving them minimally makes RTW processes easier Caseworkers must make their own assessment of clients’ work capacity, despite what the sick-listing medical doctor says |
| 3. The sustainability of the welfare state is under pressure, and saving it depends on us | Clients’ work ethic is diminishing Clients are inclined to misuse or exploit the generous welfare system Clients lack proper working attitudes, and standards were better before | Caseworkers have to be restrictive in their eligibility assessments Caseworkers must be more ”insurance-like” Caseworkers cannot be soft-hearted Casework is a heroic task Caseworkers guard the gate to the welfare state |
Source(s): Authors’ work