Table 2.

Parameters employed in each design approach

Design approachPermanent floor load, Gk: kN/m2Imposed floor load, Qk: kN/m2aPartial factor for permanent loads, γGPartial factor for imposed loads, γQPermanent load reduction factor, ξImposed load combination factor, ψTarget URMaterial strength: MPa
BS 449-2:1969: Optimal compliance3.7–3.9b3.5d1.40f1.60fN/Ac355h
BS 5950-1:2000: Optimal compliance3.7–3.9b3.5d1.40f1.60f1.0355h
EC: Omitting reduction/combination factors (ξ, ψ)3.7–3.9b3.3e1.35g1.50g1.0355h
EC: Omitting imposed load reduction factors (αa, αn)3.7–3.9b3.3e1.35g1.50g0.925g0.7g1.0355h
EC: Targeting UR = 0.83.7–3.9b3.3e1.35g1.50g0.925g0.7g0.80 j,k355h
EC: Using over-specified imposed loads3.7–3.9b4.63i1.35g1.50g0.925g0.7g1.0355h
EC: Optimal compliance3.7–3.9b3.3e1.35g1.50g0.925g0.7g1.0355h
a

Additional imposed load of 0.6 kN/m2 (BSI, 2008) is assumed to act at roof level

b

Comprising: steel self-weight (0.5 kN/m2 per storey below seven storeys, 0.7 kN/m2 per storey seven storeys and above) (SCI, 2008)

c

Target UR not applicable to the permissible stress approach employed in BS 449-2:1969 (BSI, 1969)

d

Comprising 2.5 kN/m2 plus 1.0 kN/m2 for moveable partitions (BSI, 1996)

e

Comprising 2.5 kN/m2 plus 0.8 kN/m2 for moveable partitions (BSI, 2002)

f

BSI (2001)

g

BSI (2011) 

h

BSI (2005) 

i

Orr and Drewniok (2018) 

j

Orr (2018) 

k

Orr et al. (2019) 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal