Table 1. Regression analyses results on...

Table 1.

Regression analyses results on idea originality (Study 2)

Predictor	B	SE	t	p	95% CI
Constant	5.27	2.86	1.84	0.06	−0.40; 10.94
Power	−2.83	1.75	−1.62	0.11	−6.28; 0.62
Gender	−3.15	1.74	−1.81	0.07	−6.58; 0.29
Creativity	−3.00	1.68	−1.78	0.08	−6.33; 0.33
Power × gender	2.02	1.10	1.84	0.07	−0.15; 4.19
Power × creativity	2.65	1.08	2.46	0.01	0.52; 4.77
Gender × creativity	2.78	1.08	2.58	0.01	0.65; 4.91
Power × gender × creativity	−1.85	0.68	−2.71	<0.01	−3.19; −0.50
Age	0.02	0.01	1.74	0.08	−0.002;0.03
Profession	−0.26	0.23	−1.17	0.15	−0.71; 0.18
Achieving a deal	−0.12	0.33	−0.36	0.73	−0.77; 0.54

Predictor	B	SE	t	p	95% CI
Constant	5.27	2.86	1.84	0.06	−0.40; 10.94
Power	−2.83	1.75	−1.62	0.11	−6.28; 0.62
Gender	−3.15	1.74	−1.81	0.07	−6.58; 0.29
Creativity	−3.00	1.68	−1.78	0.08	−6.33; 0.33
Power × gender	2.02	1.10	1.84	0.07	−0.15; 4.19
Power × creativity	2.65	1.08	2.46	0.01	0.52; 4.77
Gender × creativity	2.78	1.08	2.58	0.01	0.65; 4.91
Power × gender × creativity	−1.85	0.68	−2.71	<0.01	−3.19; −0.50
Age	0.02	0.01	1.74	0.08	−0.002;0.03
Profession	−0.26	0.23	−1.17	0.15	−0.71; 0.18
Achieving a deal	−0.12	0.33	−0.36	0.73	−0.77; 0.54

Notes:

Power and creativity were coded as 1 = low, 2 = high. Gender was coded as: 1 = woman, 2 = man. Achieving a deal was coded as: 1 = no, we did not make a deal, 2 = yes, we did make a deal, chronological age was measured in years; Occupational status was coded as 1 = student, 2 = employee, 3 = self-employed, 4 = unemployed, 5 = retired. Idea originality was coded as: 1 = not at all original, 5 = very original

Source: Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]