Models estimates: univariate analysis
| Variables | Observations | Fully fundend (mean) | Not fully funded (mean) | Difference test (fully funded vs not fully funded) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z-Score | 523 | 2.90 | −1.30 | −4.21*** |
| IR | 523 | 0.055 | 0.047 | −0.007** |
| MAT | 523 | 25.13 | 24.15 | −0.98 |
| HUCAP | 523 | 20.02 | 10.56 | −9.46*** |
| SOCCAP | 523 | 34.34 | 33.12 | −1.22 |
| INTCAP | 523 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.015 |
| EBIT/tot assets | 523 | 0.035 | −0.040 | −0.07** |
| WoCap/tot asset | 523 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.02 |
| AGE | 523 | 21.80 | 21.43 | −0.37 |
| NACE | 523 | 6,099 | 5,621 | −478 |
| tLIAB | 523 | 278.85 | 256.06 | −22.78 |
| SIZE | 523 | 2.02 | 1.78 | −0.23** |
| EARNING/tot asset | 523 | −0.02 | −0.11 | −0.08** |
| GEOG | 523 | 3.32 | 3.22 | −0.10 |
| SAVINGS | 523 | 17.54 | 17.28 | 0.25 |
| REDEXP | 523 | 1.76 | 1.83 | 0.07 |
| Variables | Observations | Fully fundend (mean) | Not fully funded (mean) | Difference test (fully funded vs not fully funded) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 523 | 2.90 | −1.30 | −4.21*** | |
| IR | 523 | 0.055 | 0.047 | −0.007** |
| MAT | 523 | 25.13 | 24.15 | −0.98 |
| HUCAP | 523 | 20.02 | 10.56 | −9.46*** |
| SOCCAP | 523 | 34.34 | 33.12 | −1.22 |
| INTCAP | 523 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.015 |
| EBIT/tot assets | 523 | 0.035 | −0.040 | −0.07** |
| WoCap/tot asset | 523 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.02 |
| AGE | 523 | 21.80 | 21.43 | −0.37 |
| NACE | 523 | 6,099 | 5,621 | −478 |
| tLIAB | 523 | 278.85 | 256.06 | −22.78 |
| SIZE | 523 | 2.02 | 1.78 | −0.23** |
| EARNING/tot asset | 523 | −0.02 | −0.11 | −0.08** |
| GEOG | 523 | 3.32 | 3.22 | −0.10 |
| SAVINGS | 523 | 17.54 | 17.28 | 0.25 |
| REDEXP | 523 | 1.76 | 1.83 | 0.07 |
Note(s): This table displays a comparison of mean test results between two groups: fully funded projects (consisting of 443 projects) and partially or non-fully funded projects (comprising 80 projects). Our sample encompasses a total of 523 P2P lending projects. For our univariate test, we include all projects that provide essential information and offering documents in this analysis. Statistical significance levels are denoted by ***, **, and *, indicating significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% thresholds, respectively
Source(s): Author’s own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.