Table 3

Models estimates: univariate analysis

VariablesObservationsFully fundend (mean)Not fully funded (mean)Difference test (fully funded vs not fully funded)
Z-Score5232.90−1.30−4.21***
IR5230.0550.047−0.007**
MAT52325.1324.15−0.98
HUCAP52320.0210.56−9.46***
SOCCAP52334.3433.12−1.22
INTCAP5230.420.430.015
EBIT/tot assets5230.035−0.040−0.07**
WoCap/tot asset5230.170.190.02
AGE52321.8021.43−0.37
NACE5236,0995,621−478
tLIAB523278.85256.06−22.78
SIZE5232.021.78−0.23**
EARNING/tot asset523−0.02−0.11−0.08**
GEOG5233.323.22−0.10
SAVINGS52317.5417.280.25
REDEXP5231.761.830.07

Note(s): This table displays a comparison of mean test results between two groups: fully funded projects (consisting of 443 projects) and partially or non-fully funded projects (comprising 80 projects). Our sample encompasses a total of 523 P2P lending projects. For our univariate test, we include all projects that provide essential information and offering documents in this analysis. Statistical significance levels are denoted by ***, **, and *, indicating significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% thresholds, respectively

Source(s): Author’s own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options