Table 5 Results of BSEM Relationship...

Table 5

Results of BSEM

Relationship	Estimates	S.D.	95% lower bound	95% upper bound	Min	Max
HAB → CI	0.154	0.087	0.015	0.328	0.192	0.535
FC → CI	0.114	0.059	0.013	0.231	0.126	0.360
HM → CI	0.367	0.070	0.233	0.508	0.080	0.679
PE → CI	0.159	0.090	0.017	0.339	0.242	0.561
EE → CI	0.114	0.073	0.029	0.257	0.190	0.442
INC → CI	0.158	0.071	0.019	0.298	0.130	0.473
INC → HAB	0.395	0.055	0.291	0.505	0.181	0.695
TRT → CI	0.115	0.075	0.031	0.266	0.220	0.424
TS → CI	0.117	0.080	0.040	0.277	0.216	0.471

Relationship	Estimates	S.D.	95% lower bound	95% upper bound	Min	Max
HAB → CI	0.154	0.087	0.015	0.328	0.192	0.535
FC → CI	0.114	0.059	0.013	0.231	0.126	0.360
HM → CI	0.367	0.070	0.233	0.508	0.080	0.679
PE → CI	0.159	0.090	0.017	0.339	0.242	0.561
EE → CI	0.114	0.073	0.029	0.257	0.190	0.442
INC → CI	0.158	0.071	0.019	0.298	0.130	0.473
INC → HAB	0.395	0.055	0.291	0.505	0.181	0.695
TRT → CI	0.115	0.075	0.031	0.266	0.220	0.424
TS → CI	0.117	0.080	0.040	0.277	0.216	0.471

Note(s): HAB = habit; HM = hedonic motivation; CI = continuation intention; PE = performance expectancy; TS = technology satisfaction; EE = effort expectancy; FC = facilitating condition; INC = incentives; TRT = trust; S.D. = standard deviation

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]