Comparison of estimated parameters between CB-SEM and BSEM
| CB-SEM | BSEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Predictors | Estimates | Estimates |
| HAB | 0.151 | 0.154 |
| FC | 0.112 | 0.114 |
| HM | 0.364 | 0.367 |
| PE | 0.155 | 0.159 |
| EE | 0.113 | 0.114 |
| INC | 0.156 | 0.158 |
| TRT | 0.113 | 0.115 |
| TS | 0.115 | 0.117 |
| CB-SEM | BSEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Predictors | Estimates | Estimates |
| HAB | 0.151 | 0.154 |
| FC | 0.112 | 0.114 |
| HM | 0.364 | 0.367 |
| PE | 0.155 | 0.159 |
| EE | 0.113 | 0.114 |
| INC | 0.156 | 0.158 |
| TRT | 0.113 | 0.115 |
| TS | 0.115 | 0.117 |
Note(s): HAB = habit; HM = hedonic motivation; CI = continuation intention; PE = performance expectancy; TS = technology satisfaction; EE = effort expectancy; FC = facilitating condition; INC = incentives; TRT = trust; CB-SEM = co-variance-based structural equation modelling; BSEM = Bayesian structural equation modelling
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.