Robustness analysis
| The effect of WCE on EQ | The moderating effect of FCRE on the relationship between WCE on EQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Z | Z | |
| L1 | 30.84*** | 32.86*** |
| CCCY | 18.03*** | 9.55*** |
| FSZ | 0.97 | 0.28 |
| FAG | −2.39** | −2.26** |
| CHL | 6.25*** | 3.98*** |
| ATAG | 8.89*** | 7.98*** |
| OCF | −10.31*** | −8.57*** |
| COV | 3.48*** | 4.52*** |
| BSZ | 2.55** | 1.53 |
| BIND | 1.73** | 0.76 |
| BGDY | −7.48*** | −5.05*** |
| DUA | −5.92*** | −5.47*** |
| IOW | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| MOW | 8.74 | 7.40*** |
| EXCG*CCCY | – | 1.44 |
| EXCL*CCCY | – | 7.76*** |
| Year-effect | Yes | Yes |
| Firm-effect | Yes | Yes |
| PROB | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| OBS | 649 | 649 |
| Wald χ2 | 87639.24 | 83435.94 |
| The effect of WCE on EQ | The moderating effect of FCRE on the relationship between WCE on EQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Z | Z | |
| L1 | 30.84*** | 32.86*** |
| CCCY | 18.03*** | 9.55*** |
| FSZ | 0.97 | 0.28 |
| FAG | −2.39** | −2.26** |
| CHL | 6.25*** | 3.98*** |
| ATAG | 8.89*** | 7.98*** |
| OCF | −10.31*** | −8.57*** |
| COV | 3.48*** | 4.52*** |
| BSZ | 2.55** | 1.53 |
| BIND | 1.73** | 0.76 |
| BGDY | −7.48*** | −5.05*** |
| DUA | −5.92*** | −5.47*** |
| IOW | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| MOW | 8.74 | 7.40*** |
| EXCG*CCCY | – | 1.44 |
| EXCL*CCCY | – | 7.76*** |
| Year-effect | Yes | Yes |
| Firm-effect | Yes | Yes |
| PROB | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| OBS | 649 | 649 |
| Wald | 87639.24 | 83435.94 |
Note(s): *** significant at 1%, ** significant at 5%; * significant at 10%
Source(s): Table created by the author