Table 7.

Results of the structural model hypothesis

HypothesisHypothesized
effect		Path
coefficients		Statisticsp-valuesSupported /not supported
H1aEnv. Cond. (CD, TC) → ESV“+”−0.081  Not supported
Env. Cond. (EM, IP) → ESV“+”0.3143.0900.001Supported **
H1bEnv. Cond. (CD, TC) → EP“+”0.6319.1900.000Supported***
Env. Cond. (EM, IP) → EP“+”0.0000.0040.498Not supported
H1cEnv. Cond. (CD, TC) → EC (OB)ss(88sss(hdhdh(OB)(OB)“+”0.2161.6670.048Supported *
Env. Cond. (CD, TC) → EC (MAN, WD, RW)“+”0.4393.4690.000Supported***
Env. Cond. (EM, IP) → EC (OB)“+”0.2252.5050.006Supported **
Env. Cond. (EM, IP) → EC (MAN, WD, RW)“+”0.0190.1650.435Not supported
H2aESV → EP“+”0.2443.0910.001Supported **
H2bESV → EC (OB)“+”0.4965.0830.000Supported***
ESV → EC (MAN, WD, RW)“+”0.0140.1610.436Not supported
H2cEP → EC (OB)“+”−0.247  Not supported
EP → EC (MAN, WD, RW)“+”0.2271.7390.041Supported *
H3aEP → Internationalization“+”0.3463.0630.001Supported **
H3bEC (OB) → Internationalization“+”0.1771.8040.036Supported *
EC (MAN, WD, RW) → Internationalization“+”0.3453.1150.001Supported ***
H4Env. Cond. (CD, TC) → Internationalization“+”−0.541  Not supported
Env. Cond. (EM, IP) → Internationalization“+”0.1010.8170.207Not supported

Notes:

Env. Cond = environmental conditions; CD = competitive dynamics; TC = technological change; EM = integration into the value chain; IP = integration with institutional support; EC = entrepreneurial climate; ESV = entrepreneurial strategic vision; MAN = management support; RW = rewards/reinforcement; WD: work discretion; OB = organizational boundaries; RK = risk-taking; IN = innovation; EPs = entrepreneurial process; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Source: Authors’ own work
[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal