Cross-ownership and firms’ innovation quality and efficiency
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross | 0.116* | 0.006** | 0.010*** |
| (0.064) | (0.003) | (0.003) | |
| Growth | −0.021 | −0.004*** | −0.002*** |
| (0.018) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| IND | 0.498** | 0.017 | 0.012 |
| (0.240) | (0.011) | (0.010) | |
| Lev | −0.290*** | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| (0.093) | (0.004) | (0.004) | |
| Cash | −0.496*** | −0.002 | −0.000 |
| (0.123) | (0.006) | (0.005) | |
| PPE | −0.790*** | −0.046*** | −0.039*** |
| (0.093) | (0.004) | (0.004) | |
| ROA | −0.513** | 0.175*** | 0.131*** |
| (0.241) | (0.011) | (0.009) | |
| Share | −0.400*** | 0.003 | −0.011*** |
| (0.096) | (0.005) | (0.004) | |
| Separation | 0.255 | −0.010 | −0.000 |
| (0.178) | (0.008) | (0.007) | |
| SOE | 0.115*** | −0.004** | 0.002 |
| (0.034) | (0.002) | (0.001) | |
| Size | 0.580*** | 0.010*** | 0.012*** |
| (0.018) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| Tobin_q | 0.102*** | −0.002*** | 0.001 |
| (0.012) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| Age | −0.127*** | −0.016*** | −0.012*** |
| (0.039) | (0.002) | (0.002) | |
| Year FEs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Industry FEs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | −13.077*** | −0.151*** | −0.225*** |
| (0.457) | (0.026) | (0.023) | |
| Observations | 10,020 | 17,168 | 17,168 |
| 0.308 | 0.200 | 0.156 |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.116* | 0.006** | 0.010*** | |
| (0.064) | (0.003) | (0.003) | |
| −0.021 | −0.004*** | −0.002*** | |
| (0.018) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| 0.498** | 0.017 | 0.012 | |
| (0.240) | (0.011) | (0.010) | |
| −0.290*** | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| (0.093) | (0.004) | (0.004) | |
| −0.496*** | −0.002 | −0.000 | |
| (0.123) | (0.006) | (0.005) | |
| −0.790*** | −0.046*** | −0.039*** | |
| (0.093) | (0.004) | (0.004) | |
| −0.513** | 0.175*** | 0.131*** | |
| (0.241) | (0.011) | (0.009) | |
| −0.400*** | 0.003 | −0.011*** | |
| (0.096) | (0.005) | (0.004) | |
| 0.255 | −0.010 | −0.000 | |
| (0.178) | (0.008) | (0.007) | |
| 0.115*** | −0.004** | 0.002 | |
| (0.034) | (0.002) | (0.001) | |
| 0.580*** | 0.010*** | 0.012*** | |
| (0.018) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| 0.102*** | −0.002*** | 0.001 | |
| (0.012) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| −0.127*** | −0.016*** | −0.012*** | |
| (0.039) | (0.002) | (0.002) | |
| Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| −13.077*** | −0.151*** | −0.225*** | |
| (0.457) | (0.026) | (0.023) | |
| Observations | 10,020 | 17,168 | 17,168 |
| 0.308 | 0.200 | 0.156 |
Note(s): The number of patents cited (Cite) in year t+1 from the CSMAR database is utilized to measure innovation quality. The firms’ innovation efficiency is measured by the ratio of the number of patent applications to the amount of R&D investment (Apply_ratio, Apply_I ratio). ***, ** and * denote significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively
Source(s): Authors' own work