Table 17

Cross-ownership and firms’ innovation quality and efficiency

(1)(2)(3)
Citet+1Apply_ratiot+1Apply_Iratiot+1
Cross0.116*0.006**0.010***
(0.064)(0.003)(0.003)
Growth−0.021−0.004***−0.002***
(0.018)(0.001)(0.001)
IND0.498**0.0170.012
(0.240)(0.011)(0.010)
Lev−0.290***0.0010.001
(0.093)(0.004)(0.004)
Cash−0.496***−0.002−0.000
(0.123)(0.006)(0.005)
PPE−0.790***−0.046***−0.039***
(0.093)(0.004)(0.004)
ROA−0.513**0.175***0.131***
(0.241)(0.011)(0.009)
Share−0.400***0.003−0.011***
(0.096)(0.005)(0.004)
Separation0.255−0.010−0.000
(0.178)(0.008)(0.007)
SOE0.115***−0.004**0.002
(0.034)(0.002)(0.001)
Size0.580***0.010***0.012***
(0.018)(0.001)(0.001)
Tobin_q0.102***−0.002***0.001
(0.012)(0.001)(0.001)
Age−0.127***−0.016***−0.012***
(0.039)(0.002)(0.002)
Year FEsYesYesYes
Industry FEsYesYesYes
Constant−13.077***−0.151***−0.225***
(0.457)(0.026)(0.023)
Observations10,02017,16817,168
R20.3080.2000.156

Note(s): The number of patents cited (Cite) in year t+1 from the CSMAR database is utilized to measure innovation quality. The firms’ innovation efficiency is measured by the ratio of the number of patent applications to the amount of R&D investment (Apply_ratio, Apply_I ratio). ***, ** and * denote significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively

Source(s): Authors' own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal