Table 1 Alternative measurement models χ... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1

Alternative measurement models

	χ²(df); p	Δ χ²; p	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	SRMR	AIC
Model 0: Four factors model; hypothesized	177.53 (97); 0		0.945	0.932	0.063	0.059	10,106
Model 1: One factor model	734.09 (104); 0	556.56; 0	0.573	0.507	0.171	0.121	10,648
Model 2: Two factors model (CB-HR, organizational identification and job satisfaction as one factor)	460.46 (102); 0	282.93; 0	0.757	0.714	0.130	0.088	10,378
Model 3: Three factors model (CB-HR and organizational identification as one factor)	313.98 (100); 0	136.45; 0	0.855	0.826	0.101	0.074	10,236
Model 4: Three factors model (CB-HR and job satisfaction as one factor)	354.23 (100); 0	176.7; 0	0.828	0.793	0.111	0.081	10,276
Model 5: Three factors model (organizational identification and job satisfaction as one factor)	326.17 (100); 0	148.64; 0	0.847	0.816	0.104	0.088	10,248

	χ²(df); p	Δ χ²; p	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	SRMR	AIC
Model 0: Four factors model; hypothesized	177.53 (97); 0		0.945	0.932	0.063	0.059	10,106
Model 1: One factor model	734.09 (104); 0	556.56; 0	0.573	0.507	0.171	0.121	10,648
Model 2: Two factors model (CB-HR, organizational identification and job satisfaction as one factor)	460.46 (102); 0	282.93; 0	0.757	0.714	0.130	0.088	10,378
Model 3: Three factors model (CB-HR and organizational identification as one factor)	313.98 (100); 0	136.45; 0	0.855	0.826	0.101	0.074	10,236
Model 4: Three factors model (CB-HR and job satisfaction as one factor)	354.23 (100); 0	176.7; 0	0.828	0.793	0.111	0.081	10,276
Model 5: Three factors model (organizational identification and job satisfaction as one factor)	326.17 (100); 0	148.64; 0	0.847	0.816	0.104	0.088	10,248

Note(s): Δχ² is the difference between focal model and model 0; CB-HR = commitment-based human resource practices

Source(s): Own elaboration