Table 4

Structural model results

RelationshipsModel 1Model 2Support
R2JS = 0.612
R2CC = 0.206R2CC = 0.240
H1: IL→JSc = 0.447*** (9.070) [0.372; 0.535]c′ = 0.194** (2.235) [0.050; 0.332]Yes
IL→JS = a 0.782*** (33.330) [0.745; 0.822] 
JS→CC = b 0.317*** (3.292) [0.167; 0.480] 
Control variable   
Co0.078 (1.330) [-0.018; 0.174]0.104 (1.797) [-0.010; 0.216] 

Note(s): IL: Inclusive leadership; JS: Job satisfaction; CC: Commitment for change, Co: Country-culture, (based on t(4,999), one-tailed test) t(0.05; 4,999) = 1.645; t(0.01, 4,999) = 2.327; t(0.001, 4,999) = 3.092; (based on t(4,999), two-tailed test); t(0.05, 4,999) = 1.960, t(0.01, 4,999) = 2.577; t(0.001, 4,999) = 3.292. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Source(s): Original table – created by authors of this article from data

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal