Table 1.

Four models of scholarly coworking facilities and their attributes

AttributeHome-campus coworkingInter-campus coworkingOff-campus, purpose-builtCampus as a service (CaaS)
OverviewShared campus workspace, aligning traditional facilities with coworking elementsFor scholars not affiliated with the host university, utilizing excess resources for diverse scholarshipCoworking facility targeting scholars, similar to business-sector examples, with subtypes by campus proximityAll-inclusive, envisioning a full campus for remote/freelance teachers, students, and researchers
LocationOn-campus, within a single universityOn-campus, across multiple universitiesOff-campus, near universities or in remote locationsIndependent, fully realized campus
Current statusAttempts have been common, but without breaking down within-university geographic or disciplinary barriersExamples exist in business-sector coworking spaces, but not in scholarly onesNear-campus scholarly coworking spaces are common, but without specialized design for scholars. Remote ones are unknown, but common for the business sectorWorkspace as a service (WaaS) is a concept with many examples in in business-sector coworking. Scholarly examples are unknown but some campuses seem close
AffiliationAffiliated with a single universityAffiliated with many universitiesUnaffiliated with universitiesIndependent, may have university affiliations
Target usersScholars from different departments and schools within a single universityScholars from participating universities in the reciprocal networkScholars, students and professionals, both affiliated and unaffiliated with universitiesBoth remote-working and freelance students, faculty and researchers
Geographic reachLimited to a single university campusExtends across multiple university campusesVaries: near universities or very remote locationsGlobal, supporting users from various locations
Institutional barriersBreaks down barriers between departments and schools within a universityBreaks down barriers between participating universitiesBreaks down institutional barriers entirelyTranscends institutional barriers, allowing for flexible relationships
ResourcesUtilizes existing university resourcesProvides access to resources at participating universitiesPurpose-built for scholarship, with specialized resourcesOffers extensive resources equivalent to a well-funded university campus
CollaborationPromotes interdisciplinary collaboration within a universityFacilitates interinstitutional collaboration among participating universitiesEnables collaboration based on shared interests and expertise, regardless of affiliationSupports collaboration between local and remote students, faculty and researchers
Imple-mentationRequires finding neutral territory and active facilitation by the universityDepends on reciprocal agreements and perceived mutual benefitRequires investment in purpose-built facilities and resourcesNeeds significant investment and maturity of the remote scholarship model

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options