Table 1

Microstructural perspectives in business ecosystem theory

Microstructural perspectives in ecosystem researchMain contributionAuthorsLimitations in the current ecosystem literature from microstructure perspectives
Network analysis modelsOffers concepts and metrics to study the structures of ecosystems, treating organizations as actors (nodes) in the network and conceptualizing their relationships as tiese.g.
  • Shipilov and Gawer (2020) 

  • Battistella et al. (2013) 

  • Clarysse et al. (2014) 

  • Basole et al. (2015) 

  • Sloane and O’reilly (2013) 

  • Focus on static network snapshots, neglecting dynamics

  • Lack of multilayer network frameworks and operationalizations

Ecosystem structure modelsHighlights interdependencies, alignment, and roles, among actors in ecosystemse.g.
  • Adner (2006, 2017) 

  • Jacobides et al. (2018) 

  • Thomas and Ritala (2022) 

  • One-dimensional focus on organizations and their interdependencies

  • Lack of clarity in terminology related to ecosystem layers

Ecosystem strategy modelsHighlights how organizations strategize in ecosystemse.g
  • Teece (2007) 

  • Hannah and Eisenhardt (2018) 

  • Dattée et al. (2018) 

  • In focusing on firms, strategizing, and orchestration, there is often a limited conceptualization of other ecosystem-level phenomena

Digital platform modelsHighlights how digital technologies facilitate value creation by connecting various actors within business ecosystemse.g.
  • Gawer and Cusumano (2014) 

  • Tiwana (2014) 

  • Rochet and Tirole (2003) 

  • Often lacks conceptualizations of ecosystem-level phenomena beyond actors’ interdependence with each other through the platform

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal