Table 9.

Instrumental variable analysis

Variable(s)First stageSecond stage
DEP = FrameworkDEP = CSR policy
Coefficient
(t-value)
Coefficient
(t-value)
Framework 0.1799*** (4.40)
Foreign_sales0.0005*** (2.89)0.0003*** (2.72)
Leverage0.0627 (1.53)0.0632*** (3.11)
Profit−0.4163*** (−3.97)0.0403 (0.74)
Size0.0348*** (7.09)0.0096*** (3.29)
MTB−0.0033 (−1.51)−0.0008 (−0.73)
Analysts0.0521** (5.10)0.0429*** (8.01)
Acnonex−0.0002 (−0.48)0.0000 (0.05)
Shright0.0389* (1.79)0.0062 (0.58)
Csrcommittee0.1528*** (11.93)0.0495*** (5.34)
Awards0.0877*** (8.52)0.0313*** (4.95)
Diversity0.0008*** (2.71)−0.008*** (−4.81)
Institution0.3439** (2.16)−0.0422 (−0.56)
GDP−0.1505*** (−3.49)−0.0067 (−0.31)
Civil0.3088*** (17.71)0.0104 (0.65)
Indcoun_framework0.6633*** (11.09) 
Yearcoun_framework0.7528*** (4.95) 
Constant−0.1680 (−0.32)0.4938* (1.94)
Year_FEYesYes
Industry_FEYesYes
Country_FEYesYes
N2,4432,443
F66.4153.34
Uncentered R20.90400.9787
Underindentification 139.956
Weak identification test 72.863
Sargan statistic 0.536(0.4643)

Note(s): Table 9 reports the results on the first stage of instrumental variable using FRAMEWORK as a dependent variable. The second stage results on the effect of harmonisation and multiple global CSR pronouncements, controlling for predicted FRAMEWORK score obtained in first stage. All variable definitions appear in  Appendix. ***, ** and * represent statistical significance at the 1, 5 and 10% levels, respectively (two-tailed tests)

Source(s): Table by author(s)

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal